public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: John Fusco <fusco_john@yahoo.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [vm 0/4] replace remap_page_range() with remap_pfn_range()
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 20:29:28 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040924032928.GR9106@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040924021735.GL9106@holomorphy.com>

On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 06:22:22PM -0500, John Fusco wrote:
>> Everything worked great until we decided that we needed to install 6GB 
>> in this system.  The problem is that remap_page_range() uses an unsigned 
>> long as the parameter for a physical address.  On IA32, an unsigned long 
>> is 32-bits, but the IA32 is capable of addressing well over 4GB of RAM.  
>> So physical addresses on IA32 must be larger than 32 bits.

On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 07:17:35PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> Do these patches work for you? Compiletested on sparc64.

Long-format changelog:

Resolve physical address overflow issue in the remap_page_range() API
by replacing it with remap_pfn_range(), which accepts its physical
address argument as a pfn, hence allowing the use of a single-precision
physical address argument without the risk of overflow at the API
boundary. The above issue has hobbled support for various 32-bit
architectures, including some embedded systems (ppc440 IIRC), caused
persistent portability issues for sound drivers for legacy systems
(sparc32; unfortunately this patch alone does not fully resolve those),
and according to John Fusco's reports, made drivers for some PCI-X
hardware infeasible to port to recent ia32 PAE enterprise systems. With
this patch series applied, physical address overflows on 32-bit systems
caused directly by remap_page_range() are gone forever, and ca. 100LOC
of cut-and-waste driver code are swept out of existence alongside them.


-- wli

P.S.: The existing solution to the sparc32 issue was to pass a double
	precision representation of the physical address as 2 single-
	precision arguments in an API (io_remap_page_range()) whose
	argument corresponding to those two was a single single-
	precision argument on most/all other architectures. The
	sparc32-specific issue requires more work beyond these patches
	to rectify. The most apparent consequence of the API skew is
	that drivers don't compile on sparc32 when they use
	io_remap_page_range() due to passing insufficient arguments,
	or vice-versa for drivers originally written for sparc32.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2004-09-24  3:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <41535AAE.6090700@yahoo.com>
2004-09-24  2:17 ` [vm 0/4] replace remap_page_range() with remap_pfn_range() William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-24  2:19   ` [vm 1/4] convert remap_page_range() to remap_pfn_range() William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-24  2:21     ` [vm 2/4] convert io_remap_page_range() to call remap_pfn_range() William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-24  2:23       ` [vm 3/4] convert direct callers of remap_page_range() William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-24  2:25         ` [vm 4/4] remove remap_page_range() William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-24  2:27         ` [vm 3/4] convert direct callers of remap_page_range() William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-24  3:29   ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040924032928.GR9106@holomorphy.com \
    --to=wli@holomorphy.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=fusco_john@yahoo.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox