From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Michael Hunold <hunold@linuxtv.org>
Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
sensors@Stimpy.netroedge.com,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Adding .class field to struct i2c_client (was Re: [PATCH][2.6] Add command function to struct i2c_adapter
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 09:43:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040924164315.GA7475@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4153BD2A.8030407@linuxtv.org>
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 08:22:34AM +0200, Michael Hunold wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 24.09.2004 02:02, Greg KH wrote:
> >On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 07:41:31PM +0200, Michael Hunold wrote:
> >
> >>Please have a look and tell me what you think. The big problem will be,
> >>that we cannot test all configurations, so it's possible that some
> >>devices won't be recognized anymore, because the .class entries don't
> >>match.
>
> >I like the patches. If you get them in a state you like (and drop the
> >printk(), and use dev_dbg() instead),
>
> Ok.
>
> >and send them 1 patch per file
> >with the Signed-off-by: line, I'll be glad to apply them.
>
> I'll re-create them against 2.6.9-rc2-mm2.
>
> Do you really mean one patch per file, ie. about 50 separate patches? (I
> don't care, I simply write a script that splits them up)
Sorry, I ment one email per patch (you sent more than one patch in that
email.)
thanks,
greg k-h
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-24 16:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <41500BED.8090607@linuxtv.org>
2004-09-21 13:28 ` [PATCH][2.6] Add command function to struct i2c_adapter Jean Delvare
2004-09-21 14:38 ` Michael Hunold
2004-09-21 17:41 ` Adding .class field to struct i2c_client (was " Michael Hunold
2004-09-21 20:16 ` Jon Smirl
2004-09-24 0:02 ` Greg KH
2004-09-24 6:22 ` Michael Hunold
2004-09-24 16:43 ` Greg KH [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040924164315.GA7475@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=hunold@linuxtv.org \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sensors@Stimpy.netroedge.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox