From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Cc: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>,
akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add hook for PCI resource deallocation
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 14:22:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040924212208.GD7619@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040924130251.A26271@unix-os.sc.intel.com>
On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 01:02:52PM -0700, Ashok Raj wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 05:54:14AM -0700, Kenji Kaneshige wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > This patch adds a hook 'pcibios_disable_device()' into
> > pci_disable_device() to call architecture specific PCI resource
> > deallocation code. It's a opposite part of pcibios_enable_device().
> > We need this hook to deallocate architecture specific PCI resource
> > such as IRQ resource, etc.. This patch is just for adding the hook,
> > so pcibios_disable_device() is defined as a null function on all
> > architecture so far.
> >
> > I tested this patch on i386, x86_64 and ia64. But it has not been
> > tested on other architectures because I don't have these machines.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
> >
>
> Hi Kenji
>
> I think instead of modifying all the arch specific code, you could use the __attribute__(weak)
> and define a default dummy funcion in drivers/pci/pci.c
>
> void __attribute__((weak)) pcibios_disable_device(struct pci_dev *dev) { }
>
>
> each arch that really needs this can define the override function.
> That way you dont need to put the dummy function in several places,
> containing your changes to a very few set of files.
Ohhh, nice. I like that option better. Kenji, care to respin your
patches based on this change?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-24 21:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-16 12:54 [PATCH] add hook for PCI resource deallocation Kenji Kaneshige
2004-09-17 21:49 ` Greg KH
2004-09-21 1:35 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2004-09-24 0:49 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2004-09-24 20:02 ` Ashok Raj
2004-09-24 21:22 ` Greg KH [this message]
2004-09-27 8:06 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2004-09-28 22:00 ` Greg KH
2004-09-29 0:55 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2004-09-30 21:50 ` Andrew Morton
2004-09-30 22:21 ` Ashok Raj
2004-09-30 23:03 ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-01 2:11 ` Kenji Kaneshige
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040924212208.GD7619@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox