public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Cc: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add hook for PCI resource deallocation
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 14:22:08 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040924212208.GD7619@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040924130251.A26271@unix-os.sc.intel.com>

On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 01:02:52PM -0700, Ashok Raj wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 05:54:14AM -0700, Kenji Kaneshige wrote:
> > 
> >    Hi,
> > 
> >    This patch adds a hook 'pcibios_disable_device()' into
> >    pci_disable_device() to call architecture specific PCI resource
> >    deallocation code. It's a opposite part of pcibios_enable_device().
> >    We need this hook to deallocate architecture specific PCI resource
> >    such as IRQ resource, etc.. This patch is just for adding the hook,
> >    so pcibios_disable_device() is defined as a null function on all
> >    architecture so far.
> > 
> >    I tested this patch on i386, x86_64 and ia64. But it has not been
> >    tested on other architectures because I don't have these machines.
> > 
> >    Signed-off-by: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
> > 
> 
> Hi Kenji
> 
> I think instead of modifying all the arch specific code, you could use the __attribute__(weak)
> and define a default dummy funcion in 	drivers/pci/pci.c
> 
> void __attribute__((weak)) pcibios_disable_device(struct pci_dev *dev)	{ }
> 
> 
> each arch that really needs this can define the override function.
> That way you dont need to put the dummy function in several places,
> containing your changes to a very few set of files.

Ohhh, nice.  I like that option better.  Kenji, care to respin your
patches based on this change?

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2004-09-24 21:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-09-16 12:54 [PATCH] add hook for PCI resource deallocation Kenji Kaneshige
2004-09-17 21:49 ` Greg KH
2004-09-21  1:35   ` Kenji Kaneshige
2004-09-24  0:49   ` Kenji Kaneshige
2004-09-24 20:02 ` Ashok Raj
2004-09-24 21:22   ` Greg KH [this message]
2004-09-27  8:06     ` Kenji Kaneshige
2004-09-28 22:00       ` Greg KH
2004-09-29  0:55         ` Kenji Kaneshige
2004-09-30 21:50       ` Andrew Morton
2004-09-30 22:21         ` Ashok Raj
2004-09-30 23:03           ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-01  2:11             ` Kenji Kaneshige

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040924212208.GD7619@kroah.com \
    --to=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox