From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [vm 0/6] convert remap_page_range() to remap_pfn_range() in a patch series shorter than 76 patches
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 00:44:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040925074445.GD9106@holomorphy.com> (raw)
Resolve physical address overflow issue in the remap_page_range() API
by replacing it with remap_pfn_range(), which accepts its physical
address argument as a pfn, hence allowing the use of a single-precision
physical address argument without the risk of overflow at the API
boundary. The above issue has hobbled support for various 32-bit
architectures, including some embedded systems (ppc440 IIRC), caused
persistent portability issues for sound drivers for legacy systems
(sparc32; unfortunately this patch alone does not fully resolve those),
and according to John Fusco's reports, made drivers for some PCI-X
hardware infeasible to port to recent ia32 PAE enterprise systems. With
this patch series applied, physical address overflows on 32-bit systems
caused directly by remap_page_range() are gone forever, and ca. 100LOC
of cut-and-waste driver code are swept out of existence alongside them.
-- wli
P.S.: The existing solution to the sparc32 issue was to pass a double
precision representation of the physical address as 2 single-
precision arguments in an API (io_remap_page_range()) whose
argument corresponding to those two was a single single-
precision argument on most/all other architectures. The
sparc32-specific issue requires more work beyond these patches
to rectify. The most apparent consequence of the API skew is
that drivers don't compile on sparc32 when they use
io_remap_page_range() due to passing insufficient arguments,
or vice-versa for drivers originally written for sparc32.
next reply other threads:[~2004-09-25 7:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-25 7:44 William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2004-09-25 7:47 ` [vm 1/6] introduce remap_pfn_range() to replace remap_page_range() William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-25 7:49 ` [vm 2/6] convert references to remap_page_range() under arch/ and Documentation/ to remap_pfn_range() William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-25 7:51 ` [vm 3/6] convert users of remap_page_range() under drivers/ and net/ to use remap_pfn_range() William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-25 7:53 ` [vm 4/6] convert users of remap_page_range() under include/asm-*/ " William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-25 7:55 ` [vm 5/6] convert users of remap_page_range() under sound/ " William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-25 7:58 ` [vm 6/6] for -mm only: remove remap_page_range() completely William Lee Irwin III
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040925074445.GD9106@holomorphy.com \
--to=wli@holomorphy.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox