From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: ncunningham@linuxmail.org, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@scrye.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.9-rc2-mm1 swsusp bug report.
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 05:56:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040925125606.GN9106@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <415562FE.3080709@yahoo.com.au>
Nigel Cunningham wrote:
>> Normal usage; the pattern of pages being freed and allocated inevitably
>> leads to fragmentation. The buddy allocator does a good job of
>> minimising it, but what is really needed is a run-time defragmenter. I
>> saw mention of this recently, but it's probably not that practical to
>> implement IMHO.
>
On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 10:22:22PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Well, by this stage it looks like memory is already pretty well shrunk
> as much as it is going to be, which means that even a pretty capable
> defragmenter won't be able to do anything.
For however useful defragmentation may be to make speculative use of
physically or virtually contiguous memory more probable to succeed, it
can never be made deterministic or even reliable, not even in pageable
kernels (which Linux is not). Fallback to allocations no larger than
the kernel's internal allocation unit, potentially in tandem with
scatter/gather capabilities, is essential.
-- wli
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-25 13:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-24 2:19 2.6.9-rc2-mm1 swsusp bug report Kevin Fenzi
2004-09-24 14:37 ` Pavel Machek
2004-09-24 21:09 ` Kevin Fenzi
2004-09-24 23:40 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-09-25 1:45 ` Kevin Fenzi
2004-09-25 11:53 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-09-25 12:22 ` Nick Piggin
2004-09-25 12:56 ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2004-09-25 13:21 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-09-25 12:56 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-09-25 13:38 ` Nick Piggin
2004-09-25 13:03 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-09-25 15:45 ` Pavel Machek
2004-09-25 22:03 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-09-26 10:04 ` Pavel Machek
2004-09-26 21:59 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-09-26 22:43 ` Pavel Machek
2004-09-27 10:12 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-09-26 16:18 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-09-26 18:39 ` Pavel Machek
2004-09-25 10:15 ` Pavel Machek
[not found] <2HO0C-4xh-29@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2I5b2-88s-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2I5E5-6h-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <2I7Zd-1TK-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-09-25 1:05 ` Pascal Schmidt
2004-09-25 10:16 ` Pavel Machek
2004-10-10 18:17 ` Jan Rychter
2004-10-11 13:32 ` Pavel Machek
2004-10-11 14:53 ` Jan Rychter
2004-10-17 19:10 ` Pavel Machek
2004-10-17 21:40 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-10-11 9:56 ` Stefan Seyfried
2004-10-11 14:59 ` Pavel Machek
2004-10-11 17:18 ` Stefan Seyfried
2004-10-11 19:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2004-10-12 8:55 ` Pavel Machek
2004-10-13 17:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040925125606.GN9106@holomorphy.com \
--to=wli@holomorphy.com \
--cc=kevin@scrye.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ncunningham@linuxmail.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox