From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Keith Whitwell <keith@tungstengraphics.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@gmail.com>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Xserver development <xorg@freedesktop.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: New DRM driver model - gets rid of DRM() macros!
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:31:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040929143129.A12651@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <415AB8B4.4090408@tungstengraphics.com>; from keith@tungstengraphics.com on Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 02:29:24PM +0100
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 02:29:24PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> > - drm_flush is a noop. a NULL ->flush does the same thing, just easier
> > - dito or ->poll
> > - dito for ->read
>
> Pretty sure you couldn't get away with null for these in 2.4, at least.
Umm, of course you could. There's only a hanfull instance defining a
->flush at all. Similarly all file_ops for regular files and many char
devices don't have ->poll. no ->read is pretty rare but 2.4 chæcks it
aswell.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-29 13:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-28 15:54 New DRM driver model - gets rid of DRM() macros! Jon Smirl
2004-09-28 16:56 ` Ian Romanick
2004-09-28 17:28 ` Jon Smirl
2004-09-28 19:35 ` Helge Hafting
2004-09-28 23:10 ` Dave Airlie
2004-09-29 1:27 ` Jon Smirl
2004-09-29 2:11 ` Dave Airlie
2004-09-29 5:25 ` Jon Smirl
2004-09-29 12:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-09-29 11:59 ` Alan Cox
2004-09-29 13:16 ` Dave Airlie
2004-09-29 13:29 ` Keith Whitwell
2004-09-29 13:31 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2004-09-29 13:35 ` Keith Whitwell
2004-09-29 14:12 ` Keith Whitwell
2004-09-29 14:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-09-29 14:27 ` Keith Whitwell
2004-09-29 14:39 ` Keith Whitwell
2004-09-29 19:16 ` Keith Packard
2004-09-30 18:10 ` Jon Smirl
2004-09-29 13:41 ` Dave Airlie
2004-10-01 5:15 ` Jon Smirl
2004-09-29 14:25 ` Keith Whitwell
2004-09-30 0:00 ` Eric Anholt
2004-09-29 21:52 ` Felix Kühling
2004-09-29 21:02 ` Alan Cox
2004-09-29 23:25 ` Jon Smirl
[not found] ` <20041006133714.GA26860@localdomain>
[not found] ` <9e47339104100609307307f8ea@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20041006211922.GA5167@localdomain>
2004-10-06 21:46 ` Code status (Was: New DRM driver model - gets rid of DRM() macros!) Ian Romanick
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040929143129.A12651@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=jonsmirl@gmail.com \
--cc=keith@tungstengraphics.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xorg@freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox