From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: davej@codemonkey.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix improper use of pci_module_init() in drivers/char/agp/amd64-agp.c
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 12:59:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040930195905.GA18162@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040930192008.GA28315@wotan.suse.de>
On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 09:20:09PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 11:42:48AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > In going through the tree and auditing the usage of pci_module_init(), I
> > noticed that the amd64-agp driver was assuming that the return value of
> > this function could be greater than 0 (which is what could happen in 2.2
> > and 2.4 kernels.) As this is no longer true, I think the following
> > patch is correct.
> >
> > I can add this to my bk-pci tree if you wish, otherwise feel free to
> > send it upwards.
>
> There needs to be some replacement for it, you cannot just delete
> the code.
But that code has not ever run, since early 2.5 days. Don't tell me
people are used to it :)
> The idea is to run it as fallback when no devices are found.
>
> How about this patch?
That does not work the way you are asking it to work. pci_module_init()
is just a replacement for pci_register_driver these days. It will
return either "0" if the driver is successfully registered, or a
negative value if something bad happened. It will not return the number
of devices that this driver bound to.
So, if no devices are in the system, it will return 0, and again, the
code you are wanting to run, will not.
So, how about using the new pci_dev_present() call instead? That should
be what you want, right?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-30 20:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-30 18:42 [PATCH] fix improper use of pci_module_init() in drivers/char/agp/amd64-agp.c Greg KH
2004-09-30 19:20 ` Andi Kleen
2004-09-30 19:59 ` Greg KH [this message]
2004-09-30 20:06 ` Andi Kleen
2004-09-30 21:05 ` Greg KH
2004-09-30 20:09 ` Greg KH
2004-10-01 1:56 ` Dave Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040930195905.GA18162@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=davej@codemonkey.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox