From: Willy Tarreau <willy@w.ods.org>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com>
Cc: "Miller, Mike (OS Dev)" <mike.miller@hp.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
mikem@beardog.cca.cpqcorp.net, marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, "Baker,
Brian (ISS - Houston)" <brian.b@hp.com>
Subject: Re: patch so cciss stats are collected in /proc/stat
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 07:33:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041001053301.GE721@alpha.home.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1096476186.2786.45.camel@laptop.fenrus.com>
On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 06:43:06PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> I doubt you have many customers using 2.4.28.... I suspect that by now
> the majority of people is either using an (ancient) 2.4 vendor kernel or
> a 2.6 kernel. The very low number of reports on lkml about 2.4 seems to
> confirm that ...
You must be kidding, aren't you ? I would better say that the very high
number of reports on lkml about 2.6 seems to confirm that 2.6 still is
a toy !
Marcelo has done a great job at getting 2.4 stable, and now people are
installing it in remote locations or embedded system with no planned
updated at all. And it works. Just like people did with 2.0 recently.
This may be why there are so few reports.
Willy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-01 5:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-29 16:29 patch so cciss stats are collected in /proc/stat Miller, Mike (OS Dev)
2004-09-29 16:43 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-09-29 16:58 ` Andreas Haumer
2004-10-01 5:21 ` Willy Tarreau
2004-09-29 17:20 ` mikem
2004-10-01 5:33 ` Willy Tarreau [this message]
2004-09-29 20:35 ` Marcelo Tosatti
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-09-29 19:26 Miller, Mike (OS Dev)
2004-09-29 19:39 ` Neil Horman
2004-09-29 17:25 Miller, Mike (OS Dev)
2004-09-29 16:13 mike.miller
2004-09-29 16:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-09-29 19:08 ` Neil Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041001053301.GE721@alpha.home.local \
--to=willy@w.ods.org \
--cc=arjanv@redhat.com \
--cc=brian.b@hp.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com \
--cc=mike.miller@hp.com \
--cc=mikem@beardog.cca.cpqcorp.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox