Re: [ckrm-tech] Re: [Lse-tech] [PATCH] cpusets - big numa cpu and memory placement

Matthew Dobson
2004-10-12T21:23:57Z

On Mon, 2004-10-11 at 15:58, Paul Jackson wrote:
> Matthew wrote:
> > One of the cool thing about using sched_domains as your partitioning
> > element is that in reality, tasks run on *CPUs*, not *domains*.
>
> Unfortunately, my manager has reminded me of an essential deliverable
> that I have for another project, due in two weeks. I'm going to need
> every one of those days. So I will have to take a two week sabbatical
> from this design work.
>
> It might make sense to reconvene this work on a new thread, with a last
> message on this monster thread inviting all interested parties to come
> on over. I suspect a few folks will be happy to see this thread wind
> down.
>
> I'd guess lse-tech (my preference) or ckrm-tech would be a suitable
> forum for this new thread.
>
> Carry on.

Sounds good, Paul. I think the discussion on this thread was kind of
winding down anyway. In two weeks I'll have some more work done on my
code, particularly trying to get the cpusets/CKRM filesystem interface
to play with my sched_domains code. We'll be able to digest all the the
information, requirements, requests, etc. on this thread and start a
fresh discussion on (or at least closer to) the same page.

-Matt