Re: [Lse-tech] [PATCH] cpusets - big numa cpu and memory placement

Paul Jackson
2004-10-04T15:43:54Z

Martin wrote:
> I'd think the problems would be easier to tackle if the systems knew
> about each other, and talked to each other.

Clear boundaries should be enough. If each instance of CKRM is assured
that it has control of some subset of a system that's separate and
non-overlapping, with all Memory, CPU, Tasks, and Allowed masks of said
Tasks either wholly owned by that CKRM instance, or entirely outside,
then that should do it, right?

--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.650.933.1373