From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.9-rc3[+recent swsusp patches]: swsusp kernel-preemption-unfriendly?
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 23:46:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200410062346.29489.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041006101238.GD1255@elf.ucw.cz>
On Wednesday 06 of October 2004 12:12, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > > > > It looks like there's a probel with the kernel preemption vs
swsusp:
> > > > >
> > > > > It is not in kernel preemption, see that NULL pointer dereference?
Try
> > > > > this one...
> > > > [-- snip --]
> > > >
> > > > Is it against -mm? It does not apply cleanly to -rc3, so I've applied
it
> > > > manually.
> > >
> > > It was against -suse... Did it help?
> >
> > I just can't say it didn't right now. The Oops was not readily
reproducible
> > anyway, so I need to do some more suspend/resume testing. I'll let you
> > know. ;-)
>
> Ahha, thats likely another problem, then. The one this fixes is 100%
> reproducible...
You are right, it doesn't help. Here's another trace for a non-preemptible
kernel with the patch applied:
Stopping tasks:
=================================================================|
Freeing
memory: .....................................................................................................................|
PM: Attempting to suspend to disk.
PM: snapshotting memory.
swsusp: critical section:
..<7>[nosave pfn
0x58c]...................................................................................................swsusp:
Nees
suspend: (pages needed: 44159 + 512 free: 86720)
..<7>[nosave pfn
0x58c].....................................................................................................swsusp:
c)
Unable to handle kernel paging request at 000000ff9f2f9f09 RIP:
<ffffffff805693f7>{syscall_init+7}
PML4 0
Oops: 0000 [1]
CPU 0
Modules linked in: usbserial parport_pc lp parport joydev sg st sd_mod sr_mod
scsi_mod usbhid snd_seq_oss snd_seq_midi_event snd_seq d
Pid: 16652, comm: hibernate.sh Not tainted 2.6.9-rc3
RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff805693f7>] <ffffffff805693f7>{syscall_init+7}
RSP: 0018:0000010003301e40 EFLAGS: 00010082
RAX: 0000000000000089 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 00000000b1ff96ac RSI: 0000010003301e68 RDI: ffffffff80412190
RBP: 0000000000000004 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00000000ffffffff
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffffff80424fc0
R13: 0000000000000002 R14: 0000002a955a4000 R15: 0000000000000000
FS: 0000002a95d330a0(0000) GS:ffffffff8055eb40(0000) knlGS:0000000056055200
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 000000ff9f2f9f09 CR3: 0000000000101000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
Process hibernate.sh (pid: 16652, threadinfo 0000010003300000, task
000001000f35c0f0)
Stack: ffffffff801209b9 0000000000000000 0000000000000004 8000894d50002080
00000000ffffffff ffffffff804dafa0 ffffffff80120c28 0000000000000000
ffffffff80161003 0000000000000000
Call Trace:<ffffffff801209b9>{fix_processor_context+137}
<ffffffff80120c28>{__restore_processor_state+120}
<ffffffff80161003>{swsusp_suspend+19}
<ffffffff8016216a>{pm_suspend_disk+90}
<ffffffff8015fd54>{enter_state+68}
<ffffffff802adb4d>{acpi_system_write_sleep+100}
<ffffffff80193854>{vfs_write+228} <ffffffff80193993>{sys_write+83}
<ffffffff80110c72>{system_call+126}
Code: ff a6 a1 80 ff 9b 9c 75 ff 97 96 74 ff a1 a0 7e ff 9e 9c 7d
RIP <ffffffff805693f7>{syscall_init+7} RSP <0000010003301e40>
CR2: 000000ff9f2f9f09
It seems that I need to run X to reproduce it and it also seems that it's more
likely to happen if I run some X apps and close them all before suspending.
Greets,
RJW
--
- Would you tell me, please, which way I ought to go from here?
- That depends a good deal on where you want to get to.
-- Lewis Carroll "Alice's Adventures in Wonderland"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-06 21:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-05 21:14 2.6.9-rc3[+recent swsusp patches]: swsusp kernel-preemption-unfriendly? Rafael J. Wysocki
2004-10-05 21:27 ` Pavel Machek
2004-10-06 8:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2004-10-06 8:54 ` Pavel Machek
2004-10-06 10:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2004-10-06 10:12 ` Pavel Machek
2004-10-06 21:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2004-10-06 22:06 ` Fix random crashes in x86-64 swsusp Pavel Machek
2004-10-06 22:13 ` [kernel] " Andi Kleen
2004-10-06 22:25 ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-06 22:24 ` Pavel Machek
2004-10-08 20:59 ` swsusp: 8-order memory allocations problem (was: Re: Fix random crashes in x86-64 swsusp) Rafael J. Wysocki
2004-10-10 13:48 ` Pavel Machek
2004-10-10 18:28 ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-13 17:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2004-10-14 15:37 ` swsusp: 8-order memory allocations problem (update) Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200410062346.29489.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox