From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269752AbUJGIdB (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Oct 2004 04:33:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269755AbUJGIdA (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Oct 2004 04:33:00 -0400 Received: from ms006msg.fastweb.it ([213.140.2.54]:13510 "EHLO ms006msg.fastweb.it") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269752AbUJGIc7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Oct 2004 04:32:59 -0400 From: Fabio Giovagnini Organization: Walbro Italy To: linuxsh-dev@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: RTC (real time clock) question about sh4 7760 Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 10:29:56 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 Cc: "Linux-SH (m17n)" , Linux Kernel Mailing List References: <1097080652.5420.34.camel@cambridge> <41642CBA.7030709@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <41642CBA.7030709@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200410071029.56911.fgiovag@tin.it> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi All, I'm porting linux sh onLogic PD lsh7760-10 board. The sh4 7760 doesn't have an on chip RTC (while other sh4 processors does), and the board I'm working on seems to have no RTC (maybe I2C bus connected). So in such application I think there is no RTC available; what is the best way to describe this? I think to write rtc.c rtc.h modules and write the related funcions doing nothing. Is it correct? Thanks a lot Fabio