From: Andries Brouwer <Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl>
To: linux@horizon.com
Cc: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: UDP recvmsg blocks after select(), 2.6 bug?
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 13:45:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041008114549.GD7561@apps.cwi.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041007124909.12995.qmail@science.horizon.com>
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 12:49:09PM -0000, linux@horizon.com wrote:
> How about the following?
> +.B pselect
> +is currently emulated with a user-space wrapper that has a race condition.
> +For reliable (and more portable) signal trapping, use the self-pipe trick.
> +(Where a signal handler writes to a pipe whose other end is read by the
> +main loop.)
Thanks, added.
> +.B select
> +and
> +.B pselect
> +permit blocking file descritprs in the fd_sets, even though
> +there is no valid reason for a program to do this.
Hmm.
> +When
> +.B select
> +indicates that a file descriptor is ready, this is only a strong hint,
> +not a guarantee, that a read or write is possible without blocking.
Yes, perhaps.
It was easy to decide not to take your text, since it is far too long.
Presently I have
Under Linux, select may report a socket file descriptor as
"ready for reading", while nevertheless a subsequent read
blocks. This could for example happen when data has
arrived but upon examination has wrong checksum and is
discarded. There may be other circumstances. Thus it may
be safer to use O_NONBLOCK on sockets that should not
block.
Your above few lines on the self-pipe trick suffice for select.2,
but I wouldnt mind if you (or anybody else) wrote something a bit
more explicit in select_tut.2.
Andries
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-08 11:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-07 12:49 [PATCH] Re: UDP recvmsg blocks after select(), 2.6 bug? linux
2004-10-08 11:45 ` Andries Brouwer [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041008114549.GD7561@apps.cwi.nl \
--to=andries.brouwer@cwi.nl \
--cc=cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@horizon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox