From: CaT <cat@zip.com.au>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: "Li, Shaohua" <shaohua.li@intel.com>,
Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl>
Subject: Re: promise controller resource alloc problems with ~2.6.8
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 22:52:02 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041012125202.GA920@zip.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0410100955120.3897@ppc970.osdl.org>
On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 10:00:32AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> which has a "insert_resource()" in it. That "insert_resource()" should be
> a "request_resource()" (and for you it won't matter, but other people will
> likely want to additionally apply Shaohua's patch to put in ACPI resources
> last).
>
> Hope this clears it all up. Knock wood.
Well with all the fun and the mind bendiness of the results of my
earlier tests I thought that there might be a slim chance that something
got buggered up with the lifetime of patching that particular kernel
tree got on my system and since rc4 was out I decided to start afresh.
I untarred 2.6.5, patched to 2.6.9-rc4, turned on the PCI debugging as
per request, compiled and rebooted. End result?
PDC20267: IDE controller at PCI slot 0000:00:0d.0
IRQ for 0000:00:0d.0:0 -> PIRQ 60, mask 0ef8, excl 0000 -> newirq=11 -> got IRQ 11
PCI: Found IRQ 11 for device 0000:00:0d.0
PDC20267: chipset revision 2
PDC20267: 100% native mode on irq 11
PDC20267: (U)DMA Burst Bit ENABLED Primary PCI Mode Secondary PCI Mode.
ide2: BM-DMA at 0x1080-0x1087, BIOS settings: hde:pio, hdf:pio
ide3: BM-DMA at 0x1088-0x108f, BIOS settings: hdg:pio, hdh:pio
Probing IDE interface ide2...
hde: IC35L060AVV207-0, ATA DISK drive
ide2 at 0x10f0-0x10f7,0x1802 on irq 11
Probing IDE interface ide3...
hdh: ST3200822A, ATA DISK drive
ide3 at 0x10f8-0x10ff,0x1806 on irq 11
It worked!
Now thinking that I may have just right royally buggered up I compiled
rc3 again, starting from a totally fresh tree like I did with rc4 and
the problem was still there. No promise card. (phew... kinda)
So basically, something got fixed between rc3 and rc4. Personally, I
call shenanigans.
--
Red herrings strewn hither and yon.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-12 12:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-10 5:28 promise controller resource alloc problems with ~2.6.8 Li, Shaohua
2004-10-10 17:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-10-12 12:52 ` CaT [this message]
2004-10-12 16:03 ` Greg KH
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-09-27 8:45 CaT
2004-09-30 23:03 ` CaT
2004-09-30 23:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-09-30 23:30 ` CaT
2004-09-30 23:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-10-01 0:14 ` Greg KH
2004-10-01 1:23 ` CaT
2004-10-01 10:30 ` CaT
2004-10-01 14:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-10-02 4:57 ` CaT
2004-10-02 19:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-10-10 2:19 ` CaT
2004-10-10 3:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-10-10 3:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-10-10 4:51 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041012125202.GA920@zip.com.au \
--to=cat@zip.com.au \
--cc=B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox