From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268532AbUJMGm2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Oct 2004 02:42:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268501AbUJMGm2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Oct 2004 02:42:28 -0400 Received: from omx3-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.171.20]:53421 "EHLO omx3.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269157AbUJMGli (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Oct 2004 02:41:38 -0400 Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:39:55 +1000 From: Nathan Scott To: Andrew Morton Cc: piggin@cyberone.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: Page cache write performance issue Message-ID: <20041013063955.GA2079@frodo> References: <20041013054452.GB1618@frodo> <20041012231945.2aff9a00.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041012231945.2aff9a00.akpm@osdl.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Andrew, On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 11:19:45PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > Nathan Scott wrote: > > > > So, any ideas what happened to 2.6.9? > > Does reverting the below fix it up? Reverting that one improves things slightly - I move up from ~4MB/sec to ~17MB/sec; thats just under a third of the 2.6.8 numbers I was seeing though, unfortunately. cheers. -- Nathan