Re: per-process shared information

William Lee Irwin III
2004-10-15T14:53:53Z

On Fri, 2004-10-15 at 10:28, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> The overhead is too catastrophic to tolerate. Please work with us
>> to find a sufficient approximation to whatever statistics you want
>> opposed to reverting to 2.4 algorithms or ones of similar expense.

On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 10:40:58AM -0400, Albert Cahalan wrote:
> Why not get rid of rss too then? It's overhead.

If you can't distinguish catastrophic from non-catastrophic you are
beyond my ability to help you.

-- wli