Re: per-process shared information

Andrea Arcangeli
2004-10-15T19:27:26Z

On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 11:47:13AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> workloads, rather it's known up-front that no fork()-based COW sharing
> is going on in Oracle's case, so in this case, "anonymous" very happily
> corresponds to "process-private". [..]

Ok fine.

> [..] In fact, the /proc/ changes to report
> threads only under the directory hierarchy of some distinguished thread
> assists in this estimation effort.

do you use threads now?