From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>,
Sven Dietrich <sdietrich@mvista.com>,
Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, abatyrshin@ru.mvista.com,
amakarov@ru.mvista.com, emints@ru.mvista.com,
ext-rt-dev@mvista.com, hzhang@ch.mvista.com, yyang@ch.mvista.com,
"Witold. Jaworski@Unibw-Muenchen. De"
<witold.jaworski@unibw-muenchen.de>,
arnd.heursch@unibw-muenchen.de
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Linux 2.6 Real Time Kernel
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 07:59:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041015145915.GA1266@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041014071810.GB9729@elte.hu>
On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 09:18:10AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 07:50:29AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > regarding RCU serialization - i think that is the way to go - i dont
> > > think there is any sensible way to extend RCU to a fully preempted
> > > model, RCU is all about per-CPU-ness and per-CPU-ness is quite limited
> > > in a fully preemptible model.
> >
> > It seems that way to me too. Long ago I implemented preemptible RCU,
> > but did not follow it through because I believed it was not a good
> > idea. The original patch is here :
> >
> > http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0205.1/0026.html
>
> interesting!
>
> > This allows read-side critical sections of RCU to be preempted. It
> > will take a bit of work to re-use it in RCU as of now, but I don't
> > think it makes sense to do so. [...]
>
> note that meanwhile i have implemented another variant:
>
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=109771365907797&w=2
>
> i dont think this will be the final interface (the _rt postfix is
> stupid, it should probably be _spin?), but i think this is roughly the
> structure of how to attack it - a minimal extension to the RCU APIs to
> allow for serialization. What do you think about this particular
> approach?
One caution (which you are no doubt already aware of) -- if an RCU
algorithm that reads (rcu_read_lock()/rcu_read_unlock()) in process
context and updates in softirq/bh/irq context, you can see deadlocks.
Thanx, Paul
> > [...] My primary concern is DoS/OOM situation due to preempted tasks
> > holding up RCU.
>
> in the serialization solution in -U0 it would be possible to immediately
> free the RCU entries and hence have no DoS/OOM situation - although the
> -U0 patch does not do this yet.
>
> Ingo
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-15 15:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 96+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-09 5:59 [ANNOUNCE] Linux 2.6 Real Time Kernel Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2004-10-09 6:40 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-09 7:33 ` Daniel Walker
2004-10-09 7:42 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-09 23:40 ` Matthias Urlichs
2004-10-09 8:52 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-09 23:20 ` Dave Hansen
2004-10-09 23:24 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-09 10:51 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-10-09 13:15 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-10-09 21:20 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-09 21:35 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-10-09 21:37 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-09 21:45 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-10-09 21:55 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-09 22:21 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-10-09 23:52 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-10 0:05 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-10-10 0:45 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-10 1:05 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-10-10 1:09 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-10 0:43 ` Micha Feigin
2004-10-10 1:08 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-10-09 17:41 ` Karim Yaghmour
2004-10-09 18:30 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-09 21:26 ` stefan.eletzhofer
2004-10-09 19:30 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-09 19:38 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-10-09 21:38 ` stefan.eletzhofer
2004-10-09 19:47 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-09 20:11 ` Karim Yaghmour
2004-10-09 20:14 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-09 20:53 ` Karim Yaghmour
2004-10-09 20:59 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-09 20:20 ` Robert Love
2004-10-09 20:25 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-10 1:15 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-10 8:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-10 19:41 ` Daniel Walker
2004-10-10 19:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-10 21:20 ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-10 21:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-11 17:53 ` Daniel Walker
2004-10-11 20:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-11 21:44 ` Sven Dietrich
2004-10-11 21:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-11 23:05 ` Sven Dietrich
2004-10-12 5:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-14 5:09 ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-10-14 7:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-15 14:59 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2004-10-15 15:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-15 16:40 ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-10-15 16:45 ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-10-17 17:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-12 18:50 ` Daniel Walker
2004-10-12 19:46 ` [Ext-rt-dev] " Thomas Gleixner
2004-10-12 20:31 ` Sven Dietrich
2004-10-12 20:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-10-13 0:30 ` George Anzinger
2004-10-12 21:12 ` Bill Huey
2004-10-12 21:24 ` Bill Huey
2004-10-12 21:32 ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-10-12 23:13 ` Bill Huey
2004-10-12 21:41 ` Sven Dietrich
2004-10-12 22:57 ` Bill Huey
2004-10-12 23:17 ` Adam Heath
2004-10-12 23:36 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-12 23:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-10-13 2:02 ` K.R. Foley
2004-10-13 13:39 ` Martijn Sipkema
2004-10-13 13:26 ` La Monte H.P. Yarroll
2004-10-13 15:04 ` Martijn Sipkema
2004-10-13 14:55 ` Kurt Wall
2004-10-13 14:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-10-13 15:56 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-13 16:13 ` Robert Love
2004-10-13 17:14 ` Martijn Sipkema
2004-10-13 3:55 ` Bill Huey
2004-10-12 22:00 ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-10-12 22:36 ` Bill Huey
2004-10-12 23:10 ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-10-12 23:33 ` Bill Huey
2004-10-12 23:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-10-12 23:52 ` Bill Huey
2004-10-13 0:59 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-10-10 12:21 ` John Richard Moser
2004-10-10 17:26 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-10 18:45 ` John Richard Moser
2004-10-10 20:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-10 20:44 ` John Richard Moser
2004-10-10 17:29 ` Daniel Walker
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-10-09 11:38 John Hedditch
2004-10-09 22:54 Sven Dietrich
2004-10-11 15:28 Vadim Lebedev
2004-10-11 15:50 ` Eugeny S. Mints
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041015145915.GA1266@us.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
--cc=abatyrshin@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=amakarov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=arnd.heursch@unibw-muenchen.de \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dwalker@mvista.com \
--cc=emints@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=ext-rt-dev@mvista.com \
--cc=hzhang@ch.mvista.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=sdietrich@mvista.com \
--cc=witold.jaworski@unibw-muenchen.de \
--cc=yyang@ch.mvista.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox