public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>,
	Sven Dietrich <sdietrich@mvista.com>,
	Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, abatyrshin@ru.mvista.com,
	amakarov@ru.mvista.com, emints@ru.mvista.com,
	ext-rt-dev@mvista.com, hzhang@ch.mvista.com, yyang@ch.mvista.com,
	"Witold. Jaworski@Unibw-Muenchen. De" 
	<witold.jaworski@unibw-muenchen.de>,
	arnd.heursch@unibw-muenchen.de
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Linux 2.6 Real Time Kernel
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 07:59:16 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041015145915.GA1266@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041014071810.GB9729@elte.hu>

On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 09:18:10AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 07:50:29AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > 
> > > regarding RCU serialization - i think that is the way to go - i dont
> > > think there is any sensible way to extend RCU to a fully preempted
> > > model, RCU is all about per-CPU-ness and per-CPU-ness is quite limited 
> > > in a fully preemptible model.
> > 
> > It seems that way to me too. Long ago I implemented preemptible RCU,
> > but did not follow it through because I believed it was not a good
> > idea. The original patch is here :
> > 
> > http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0205.1/0026.html
> 
> interesting!
> 
> > This allows read-side critical sections of RCU to be preempted. It
> > will take a bit of work to re-use it in RCU as of now, but I don't
> > think it makes sense to do so. [...]
> 
> note that meanwhile i have implemented another variant:
> 
>   http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=109771365907797&w=2
> 
> i dont think this will be the final interface (the _rt postfix is
> stupid, it should probably be _spin?), but i think this is roughly the
> structure of how to attack it - a minimal extension to the RCU APIs to
> allow for serialization. What do you think about this particular
> approach?

One caution (which you are no doubt already aware of) -- if an RCU
algorithm that reads (rcu_read_lock()/rcu_read_unlock()) in process
context and updates in softirq/bh/irq context, you can see deadlocks.

						Thanx, Paul

> > [...] My primary concern is DoS/OOM situation due to preempted tasks
> > holding up RCU.
> 
> in the serialization solution in -U0 it would be possible to immediately
> free the RCU entries and hence have no DoS/OOM situation - although the
> -U0 patch does not do this yet.
> 
> 	Ingo
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2004-10-15 15:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 96+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-10-09  5:59 [ANNOUNCE] Linux 2.6 Real Time Kernel Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2004-10-09  6:40 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-09  7:33   ` Daniel Walker
2004-10-09  7:42     ` Lee Revell
2004-10-09 23:40       ` Matthias Urlichs
2004-10-09  8:52     ` Lee Revell
2004-10-09 23:20     ` Dave Hansen
2004-10-09 23:24       ` Lee Revell
2004-10-09 10:51 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-10-09 13:15 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-10-09 21:20   ` Lee Revell
2004-10-09 21:35     ` Måns Rullgård
2004-10-09 21:37       ` Lee Revell
2004-10-09 21:45         ` Måns Rullgård
2004-10-09 21:55       ` Lee Revell
2004-10-09 22:21         ` Måns Rullgård
2004-10-09 23:52       ` Lee Revell
2004-10-10  0:05         ` Måns Rullgård
2004-10-10  0:45           ` Lee Revell
2004-10-10  1:05             ` Måns Rullgård
2004-10-10  1:09               ` Lee Revell
2004-10-10  0:43       ` Micha Feigin
2004-10-10  1:08         ` Måns Rullgård
2004-10-09 17:41 ` Karim Yaghmour
2004-10-09 18:30   ` Lee Revell
2004-10-09 21:26     ` stefan.eletzhofer
2004-10-09 19:30       ` Lee Revell
2004-10-09 19:38         ` Måns Rullgård
2004-10-09 21:38         ` stefan.eletzhofer
2004-10-09 19:47           ` Lee Revell
2004-10-09 20:11             ` Karim Yaghmour
2004-10-09 20:14               ` Lee Revell
2004-10-09 20:53                 ` Karim Yaghmour
2004-10-09 20:59                   ` Lee Revell
2004-10-09 20:20             ` Robert Love
2004-10-09 20:25               ` Lee Revell
2004-10-10  1:15 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-10  8:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-10 19:41   ` Daniel Walker
2004-10-10 19:46     ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-10 21:20     ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-10 21:59       ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-11 17:53         ` Daniel Walker
2004-10-11 20:49           ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-11 21:44             ` Sven Dietrich
2004-10-11 21:54               ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-11 23:05                 ` Sven Dietrich
2004-10-12  5:50                   ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-14  5:09                     ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-10-14  7:18                       ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-15 14:59                         ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2004-10-15 15:45                           ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-15 16:40                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-10-15 16:45                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-10-17 17:12                       ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-12 18:50             ` Daniel Walker
2004-10-12 19:46               ` [Ext-rt-dev] " Thomas Gleixner
2004-10-12 20:31                 ` Sven Dietrich
2004-10-12 20:37                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-10-13  0:30                   ` George Anzinger
2004-10-12 21:12                 ` Bill Huey
2004-10-12 21:24                   ` Bill Huey
2004-10-12 21:32                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-10-12 23:13                       ` Bill Huey
2004-10-12 21:41                   ` Sven Dietrich
2004-10-12 22:57                     ` Bill Huey
2004-10-12 23:17                       ` Adam Heath
2004-10-12 23:36                         ` Lee Revell
2004-10-12 23:25                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-10-13  2:02                       ` K.R. Foley
2004-10-13 13:39                       ` Martijn Sipkema
2004-10-13 13:26                         ` La Monte H.P. Yarroll
2004-10-13 15:04                           ` Martijn Sipkema
2004-10-13 14:55                             ` Kurt Wall
2004-10-13 14:52                               ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-10-13 15:56                         ` Lee Revell
2004-10-13 16:13                           ` Robert Love
2004-10-13 17:14                           ` Martijn Sipkema
2004-10-13  3:55                     ` Bill Huey
2004-10-12 22:00                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-10-12 22:36                     ` Bill Huey
2004-10-12 23:10                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-10-12 23:33                         ` Bill Huey
2004-10-12 23:37                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-10-12 23:52                             ` Bill Huey
2004-10-13  0:59                         ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-10-10 12:21 ` John Richard Moser
2004-10-10 17:26   ` Lee Revell
2004-10-10 18:45     ` John Richard Moser
2004-10-10 20:20       ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-10 20:44         ` John Richard Moser
2004-10-10 17:29   ` Daniel Walker
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-10-09 11:38 John Hedditch
2004-10-09 22:54 Sven Dietrich
2004-10-11 15:28 Vadim Lebedev
2004-10-11 15:50 ` Eugeny S. Mints

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20041015145915.GA1266@us.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=abatyrshin@ru.mvista.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=amakarov@ru.mvista.com \
    --cc=arnd.heursch@unibw-muenchen.de \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=dwalker@mvista.com \
    --cc=emints@ru.mvista.com \
    --cc=ext-rt-dev@mvista.com \
    --cc=hzhang@ch.mvista.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=sdietrich@mvista.com \
    --cc=witold.jaworski@unibw-muenchen.de \
    --cc=yyang@ch.mvista.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox