From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S268166AbUJPRW1 (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Oct 2004 13:22:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S268167AbUJPRW1 (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Oct 2004 13:22:27 -0400 Received: from emailhub.stusta.mhn.de ([141.84.69.5]:6921 "HELO mailout.stusta.mhn.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S268166AbUJPRWZ (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Oct 2004 13:22:25 -0400 Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 19:21:54 +0200 From: Adrian Bunk To: Ivan Kokshaysky Cc: Erwin Schoenmakers , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: PROBLEM: while building kernel 2.6.8.1. for Alpha (Miata) Message-ID: <20041016172154.GH5307@stusta.de> References: <417139A2.5090705@planet.nl> <20041016191704.A20686@jurassic.park.msu.ru> <20041016153017.GE5307@stusta.de> <20041016195847.A20976@jurassic.park.msu.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041016195847.A20976@jurassic.park.msu.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Oct 16, 2004 at 07:58:47PM +0400, Ivan Kokshaysky wrote: > On Sat, Oct 16, 2004 at 05:30:17PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > What are the required versions on Alpha? > > IIRC, gcc >= 3.3.4, binutils >= 2.13. The gcc dependency sounds pretty tough. Why isn't even gcc 3.3.3 able to produce a kernel on Alpha? > > According to Documentation/Changes, Erwin's versions were OK. > > Probably it needs to be updated. I doubt if these versions > work on x86_64 at all, for example. That's the smaller problem. Since you can't build a gcc 2.95 for amd64 noone can try using it for building the kernel... > Ivan. cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed