public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Cc: James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add unschedule_delayed_work to the workqueue API
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 14:43:54 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041018144354.2118138f.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1098134994.2792.325.camel@mulgrave>

James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2004-10-18 at 16:26, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Mon, 2004-10-18 at 16:25, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > The usual way of doing this is:
> > > 
> > > 	cancel_delayed_work(...);
> 
> OK, found it in the headers, sorry .. it's not synchronous, so it can't
> really be used in most of the cases where we use del_timer_sync().

cancel_delayed_work() will tell you whether it successfully cancelled the
timer.  If it didn't, you should run flush_workqueue() to wait on the final
handler.  The combination of the two is synchronous.

The missing link is cancellation of a delayed work which re-adds itself and
where the calling code has no way of telling the handler to not re-arm
itself.  There's a patch in -mm to add that function, but I don't like it.
That's cancel_rearming_delayed_work.patch.

  reply	other threads:[~2004-10-18 21:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-10-18 16:31 [PATCH] add unschedule_delayed_work to the workqueue API James Bottomley
2004-10-18 21:25 ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-18 21:26   ` James Bottomley
2004-10-18 21:29     ` James Bottomley
2004-10-18 21:43       ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2004-10-18 21:47         ` James Bottomley
2004-10-18 22:02           ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-18 22:15             ` James Bottomley
2004-10-18 22:57               ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-18 23:24                 ` James Bottomley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20041018144354.2118138f.akpm@osdl.org \
    --to=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox