From: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: bgagnon@coradiant.com,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Memory leak in 2.4.27 kernel, using mmap raw packet sockets
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 12:35:22 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041019143522.GA8688@logos.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1097980764.13226.21.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Sun, Oct 17, 2004 at 03:39:26AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Gwe, 2004-10-15 at 19:23, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > I prefer doing the "if (PageReserved(page)) put_page_testzero(page)" as
> > you propose instead of changing get_user_pages(), as there are several
> > users which rely on its behaviour.
> >
> > I have applied your fix to the 2.4 BK tree.
>
> That isnt sufficient. Consider anything else taking a reference to the
> page and the refcount going negative.
You mean not going negative? The problem here as I understand here is
we dont release the count if the PageReserved is set, but we should.
You mean there are other codepaths which release pages? That use __free_pages
which ignores PageReserved pages.
Is the problem wider than what I think?
> And yes 2.6.x has this problem and
> far worse in some ways, but it also has the mechanism to fix it.
>
> 2.6.x uses VM_IO as a VMA flag which tells the kernel two things
> a) get_user_pages fails on it
> b) core dumping of it is forbidden
>
> 2.6.x is missing a whole pile of these (fixed in the 2.6.9-ac tree I'm
> putting together). I *think* remap_page_range() in 2.6.x can just set
> VM_IO, but older kernels didn't pass the vma so all the users would need
> fixing (OSS audio, media/video, usb audio, usb video, frame buffer
> etc).
All these are have codepaths which release pages using put_page()'s?
Thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-19 17:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-14 14:50 Memory leak in 2.4.27 kernel, using mmap raw packet sockets bgagnon
2004-10-15 18:23 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-10-17 2:39 ` Alan Cox
2004-10-19 14:35 ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2004-10-20 18:43 ` Alan Cox
2004-10-20 23:24 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-10-23 14:17 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-11-25 15:02 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-11-25 20:32 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-11-25 17:12 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-11-25 23:13 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-11-25 19:45 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-11-26 1:04 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-11-30 4:03 ` David S. Miller
2004-11-30 4:16 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-11-30 6:11 ` David S. Miller
2004-11-30 6:19 ` David S. Miller
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-10-21 13:39 O.Sezer
2004-10-21 14:26 ` Andrea Arcangeli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041019143522.GA8688@logos.cnet \
--to=marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=bgagnon@coradiant.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox