From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269610AbUJWBHO (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Oct 2004 21:07:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269600AbUJWBGy (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Oct 2004 21:06:54 -0400 Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:28602 "EHLO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269760AbUJWBGj (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Oct 2004 21:06:39 -0400 Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 03:06:35 +0200 From: Andi Kleen To: Venkatesh Pallipadi Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@suse.de, pavel@ucw.cz Subject: Re: [PATCH] HPET reenabling after suspend-resume Message-ID: <20041023010635.GD16136@wotan.suse.de> References: <20041022172659.A1632@unix-os.sc.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041022172659.A1632@unix-os.sc.intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 05:26:59PM -0700, Venkatesh Pallipadi wrote: > > hpet hardware seems to need a little prodding during resume for it to start > sending the timer interupts again. Attached patch does it for both i386 > and x86_64. Hmm, what HPET hardware? It must have worked on some machines already, otherwise suspend/resume would have never worked on many AMD x86-64 machines. Anyways, looks good. -Andi