From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261243AbUJWQ7v (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Oct 2004 12:59:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261245AbUJWQ7v (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Oct 2004 12:59:51 -0400 Received: from nysv.org ([213.157.66.145]:23176 "EHLO nysv.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261243AbUJWQ7u (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Oct 2004 12:59:50 -0400 Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 19:59:39 +0300 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.9-mm1 Message-ID: <20041023165939.GS26192@nysv.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3aa654a404102300221317f104@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i From: mjt@nysv.org (Markus =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=20T=F6rnqvist?=) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Avuton Olrich wrote: >What hurts when including it, when people have the choice not to >compile in and have the big EXPERIMENTAL warning? Have to say "me too" Been using Reiser4 for a long, long time and all's well on the western front. There is no reason not to merge this baby, in my opinion, but it's a good idea to have the EXPERIMENTAL text there for a while longer. -- mjt