Re: BK kernel workflow

Scott Lockwood
2004-10-29T19:43:41Z

None of which contradicts "exchange of rights for a licsense" at all. The
agreement is not one sided - if you don't agree to the restrictions, you
have no liscense to use the software, period. Imposition of new terms that
one party did not agree to AFTER a contract was executed is what that law
is likely directed at - and that's the same just about anywhere in the
world.

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Scott Lockwood wrote:
>
> | In what way is that improper? Just because you think so, or do you have
> | something you can cite in the spanish legal system that forbids this
> sort
> | of exchange of rights for a licsense?
>
> Improper in the way of misusing the legal system. For example, many of
> the clauses of the EULA of Microsoft products are not legal following
> the civil laws
>
> «art 1256
> La validez y el cumplimiento de los contratos no pueden dejarse al
> arbitrio de uno de los contratantes.»
>
> The validity and the fulfillment of contracts cannot be left to the will
> of one of the contractors
>
> «Art. 1275
> Los contratos sin causa, o con causa ilícita, no producen efecto alguno.
> Es ilícita la causa cuando se opone a las leyes o a la moral. »
>
> The contracts without cause, or with illicit cause, do not produce
> effect some.The cause is illicit when it is against to the laws or the
> moral
> - --
> Ramón Rey Vicente <ramon.rey en hispalinux.es>
> JID rreylinux@jabber.org - GPG public key id 0x9F28E377
> GPG Fingerprint 0BC2 8014 2445 51E8 DE87 C888 C385 A9D3 9F28 E377
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFBgpI8w4Wp058o43cRAhtRAJ9E88cxLUnOul/5WT9k5qWPJ1d7AwCgk4rP
> PQfdsdnSouUZ6nISeS0IZWc=
> =OeZx
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>