Re: BK kernel workflow

Scott Lockwood
2004-10-29T19:04:24Z

In what way is that improper? Just because you think so, or do you have
something you can cite in the spanish legal system that forbids this sort
of exchange of rights for a licsense?

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Larry McVoy wrote:
>
> | Given that BK isn't hiding anything, the "reverse engineering for
> | interoperability" does not apply. Hello? Anyone listening? Didn't
> | think so. Sigh.
>
> Ok, you are right.
>
> Other issue in my country laws is: "in a contract, improper clauses have
> no validity at all". In other words, you cannot forbid me contributing
> to other SCM.
> - --
> Ramón Rey Vicente <ramon.rey en hispalinux.es>
> JID rreylinux@jabber.org - GPG public key id 0x9F28E377
> GPG Fingerprint 0BC2 8014 2445 51E8 DE87 C888 C385 A9D3 9F28 E377
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFBgocGw4Wp058o43cRAlSTAKCjAuUlbE7kACmMgKP1vAZvMRxlhQCfXC1B
> UASb6oajbHgb+mKdSuQi1OE=
> =Z6Ey
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>