From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@istop.com>
To: Timothy Miller <miller@techsource.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Some discussion points open source friendly graphics [was: HARDWARE: Open-Source-Friendly Graphics Cards -- Viable?]
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 14:38:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200410271438.30899.phillips@istop.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <417D21C8.30709@techsource.com>
On Monday 25 October 2004 11:54, Timothy Miller wrote:
> The reprogramability of the FPGA has many advantages, but
> reprogramability is not its primary purpose.
But it might turn out to be a reason for it turning into a geek trophy, if the
price is not enormously higher than closed-spec cards. You could for
example, program real-time sound effects processing into the FPGA and output
the samples through a standard sound card.
The enthusiast market is a big market these days.
> The picture I have in my head at this time expands on the idea of the
> setup engine seen in most GPU's. What I'm thinking is that the setup
> engine will be general-purpose-ish CPU with special vector and matrix
> instructions. This way, the transformation stage will occur in
> "software" executed by a specialized processor. Additionally, the
> lighting phase might be done here as well.
>
> The setup engine would produce triangle parameters which are fed to a
> rasterizer which does Gouraud shading and texture-mapping. That feeds
> pixels into something that handles antialiasing and alpha blending, etc.
I hope you're planning to have a divider available to the rasterizer for
perspective interpolation, particularly of textures.
Regards,
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-27 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-25 15:54 Some discussion points open source friendly graphics [was: HARDWARE: Open-Source-Friendly Graphics Cards -- Viable?] Timothy Miller
2004-10-25 20:31 ` Some discussion points open source friendly graphics karl.vogel
2004-10-25 20:34 ` Some discussion points open source friendly graphics [was: HARDWARE: Open-Source-Friendly Graphics Cards -- Viable?] Jeff Garzik
2004-10-25 22:45 ` Timothy Miller
2004-10-27 18:23 ` Daniel Phillips
2004-10-27 19:04 ` linux-os
2004-10-29 15:48 ` Timothy Miller
2004-10-29 15:46 ` Timothy Miller
2004-10-26 13:09 ` Giuseppe Bilotta
2004-10-26 15:27 ` Timothy Miller
2004-10-26 15:26 ` linux-os
2004-10-26 16:04 ` Timothy Miller
[not found] ` <6.1.2.0.1.20041026110017.021ece28@mail.javagear.com>
2004-10-26 19:21 ` Timothy Miller
[not found] ` <200410251535.27852.rmiller@duskglow.com>
[not found] ` <417D80B0.6080007@techsource.com>
[not found] ` <200410251734.39703.rmiller@duskglow.com>
2004-10-25 23:06 ` Need help and advice... " Timothy Miller
2004-10-27 18:38 ` Daniel Phillips [this message]
2004-10-29 15:47 ` Some discussion points open source friendly graphics " Timothy Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200410271438.30899.phillips@istop.com \
--to=phillips@istop.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miller@techsource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox