public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
To: "Andrew A." <aathan-linux-kernel-1542@cloakmail.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	roland@topspin.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: Consistent lock up 2.6.10-rc1-bk7 (mutex/SCHED_RR bug?)
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 10:06:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041029100646.F14339@build.pdx.osdl.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OMEGLKPBDPDHAGCIBHHJGEMIFCAA.aathan-linux-kernel-1542@cloakmail.com>; from aathan-linux-kernel-1542@cloakmail.com on Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 12:43:11PM -0400

* Andrew A. (aathan-linux-kernel-1542@cloakmail.com) wrote:
> I suspect what is happening here is that my process is essentially in a
> 
> while(1)
> {
>   lock();
>   unlock();
> }
> 
> loop from two or mode SCHED_RR threads running at nice -15.  They seem to be unkillable.

Give yourself a shell that's SCHED_RR with a higher priority.  I've used
the small hack below to debug userspace SCHED_RR problems (newer distros
have a chrt utility to do this).

thanks,
-chris
--

#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sched.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <errno.h>

main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
	pid_t pid = 0;
	int priority = 99;
	int policy = SCHED_RR;
	struct sched_param sched;

	if (argc > 1) {
		pid = atoi(argv[1]);
		if (argc > 2) {
			priority = atoi(argv[2]);
			if (argc > 3)
				policy = atoi(argv[3]);
		}
	}

	memset(&sched, 0, sizeof(sched));
	sched.sched_priority = priority;
	if (sched_setscheduler(pid, policy, &sched) < 0) {
		printf("setscheduler: %s\n", strerror(errno));
		exit(1);
	}

	if (!pid) { /* turn this into a shell */
		argv[0] = "/bin/bash";
		argv[1] = NULL;
		execv(argv[0], argv);
	}

}

  reply	other threads:[~2004-10-29 17:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <OMEGLKPBDPDHAGCIBHHJMEIDFCAA.aathan-linux-kernel-1542@cloakmail.com>
2004-10-29 14:26 ` Consistent lock up 2.6.10-rc1-bk7 (mutex/SCHED_RR bug?) Andrew
2004-10-29 15:07   ` Alan Cox
2004-10-29 16:43     ` Andrew A.
2004-10-29 17:06       ` Chris Wright [this message]
2004-10-29 17:44         ` Andrew A.
2004-10-29 20:32           ` Chris Wright
2004-10-29 15:36   ` Andrew A.
2004-10-29 15:52   ` Andrew A.

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20041029100646.F14339@build.pdx.osdl.net \
    --to=chrisw@osdl.org \
    --cc=aathan-linux-kernel-1542@cloakmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=roland@topspin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox