From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263239AbUJ2LeS (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Oct 2004 07:34:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263260AbUJ2LeP (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Oct 2004 07:34:15 -0400 Received: from mx1.elte.hu ([157.181.1.137]:31631 "EHLO mx1.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263239AbUJ2LdA (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Oct 2004 07:33:00 -0400 Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 13:34:05 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?= Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] SysRq-n changes RT tasks to normal Message-ID: <20041029113405.GA32204@elte.hu> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-ELTE-SpamVersion: MailScanner 4.31.6-itk1 (ELTE 1.2) SpamAssassin 2.63 ClamAV 0.73 X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-4.9, required 5.9, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -4.90 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamScore: -4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Måns Rullgård wrote: > + for_each_process (p) { > + if (!rt_task(p)) > + continue; > + > + read_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock); > + rq = task_rq_lock(p, &flags); you must take the tasklist_lock outside the for_each_process(). otherwise, looks good. Ingo