From: Florian Schmidt <mista.tapas@gmx.net>
To: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Paul Davis <paul@linuxaudiosystems.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
mark_h_johnson@raytheon.com, Bill Huey <bhuey@lnxw.com>,
Adam Heath <doogie@debian.org>,
Michal Schmidt <xschmi00@stud.feec.vutbr.cz>,
Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano <nando@ccrma.stanford.edu>,
Karsten Wiese <annabellesgarden@yahoo.de>,
jackit-devel <jackit-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Rui Nuno Capela <rncbc@rncbc.org>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-mm1-V0.4]
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 23:38:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041030233849.498fbb0f@mango.fruits.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1099171567.1424.9.camel@krustophenia.net>
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 17:26:06 -0400
Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-10-30 at 23:13 +0200, Florian Schmidt wrote:
> > ah, ok.. tarball updated. The third argument is now a percentage. If the
> > cycle count difference between two different wakeups differs more than the
> > specified percentage from the "perfect" period, then a line is printed to
> > the terminal showing by how much percent it differs.
>
> OK this is pretty sweet. With T3 the jitter never exceeds 7% on an idle
> system. As soon as I start moving the mouse this goes to 7 or 8%. I
> cannot get it to go higher than 10%. Moving windows around has no
> effect, the highest jitter happens when I type or move the mouse really
> fast IOW it corresponds to the interrupt rate.
>
> This is a pretty good baseline for what an xrun-free system would look
> like. Now to test the latest version...
Well,
on V0.5.16 i see something like the below output (which is much worse). It
seems that missed irq's with rtc show up at the same time as the xruns in
jackd do [i ran both jackd and wakeup in parallel].
While there's no way to deterministically force missed irq's by window
wiggling [we should make it olympic discipline :)], UI action seems to raise
the probability somewhat.
~/source/my_projects/wakeup$ ./rt_wakeup 1024 50000 10
freq: 1024 #: 50000
getting cpu speed
1194.908 MHz
# of cycles for "perfect" period: 1166902
setting up /dev/rtc.
locking memory...
turning irq on, beginning measurement (might take a while).
threshold violated: 1485237 cycles since last wakeup (27.2804%).
threshold violated: 1047469 cycles since last wakeup (10.235%).
threshold violated: 964069 cycles since last wakeup (17.3822%).
ouch! we missed one ore more irq[s]
threshold violated: 4037774 cycles since last wakeup (246.025%).
threshold violated: 620764 cycles since last wakeup (46.8024%).
threshold violated: 10327889 cycles since last wakeup (785.069%).
ouch! we missed one ore more irq[s]
threshold violated: 700832 cycles since last wakeup (39.9408%).
threshold violated: 3148900 cycles since last wakeup (169.851%).
ouch! we missed one ore more irq[s]
threshold violated: 231791 cycles since last wakeup (80.1362%).
threshold violated: 768584 cycles since last wakeup (34.1347%).
ouch! we missed one ore more irq[s]
threshold violated: 3500123 cycles since last wakeup (199.95%).
threshold violated: 2581587 cycles since last wakeup (121.234%).
threshold violated: 920020 cycles since last wakeup (21.157%).
threshold violated: 2430290 cycles since last wakeup (108.269%).
threshold violated: 240850 cycles since last wakeup (79.3599%).
threshold violated: 3614768 cycles since last wakeup (209.775%).
ouch! we missed one ore more irq[s]
threshold violated: 883969 cycles since last wakeup (24.2465%).
threshold violated: 479302 cycles since last wakeup (58.9253%).
threshold violated: 830208 cycles since last wakeup (28.8537%).
threshold violated: 2313154 cycles since last wakeup (98.2304%).
threshold violated: 516698 cycles since last wakeup (55.7205%).
threshold violated: 2545998 cycles since last wakeup (118.184%).
ouch! we missed one ore more irq[s]
threshold violated: 4466286 cycles since last wakeup (282.747%).
ouch! we missed one ore more irq[s]
threshold violated: 565233 cycles since last wakeup (51.5612%).
threshold violated: 184668 cycles since last wakeup (84.1745%).
threshold violated: 2854676 cycles since last wakeup (144.637%).
threshold violated: 3384620 cycles since last wakeup (190.052%).
ouch! we missed one ore more irq[s]
threshold violated: 282832 cycles since last wakeup (75.7621%).
threshold violated: 2741798 cycles since last wakeup (134.964%).
ouch! we missed one ore more irq[s]
threshold violated: 1405657 cycles since last wakeup (20.4606%).
threshold violated: 227030 cycles since last wakeup (80.5442%).
threshold violated: 3476092 cycles since last wakeup (197.891%).
ouch! we missed one ore more irq[s]
threshold violated: 448723 cycles since last wakeup (61.5458%).
threshold violated: 2390327 cycles since last wakeup (104.844%).
ouch! we missed one ore more irq[s]
threshold violated: 1489252 cycles since last wakeup (27.6244%).
threshold violated: 517884 cycles since last wakeup (55.6189%).
threshold violated: 3774860 cycles since last wakeup (223.494%).
ouch! we missed one ore more irq[s]
threshold violated: 1762452 cycles since last wakeup (51.0368%).
threshold violated: 1545052 cycles since last wakeup (32.4063%).
ouch! we missed one ore more irq[s]
threshold violated: 442749 cycles since last wakeup (62.0577%).
threshold violated: 2230841 cycles since last wakeup (91.1764%).
threshold violated: 5825655 cycles since last wakeup (399.241%).
ouch! we missed one ore more irq[s]
threshold violated: 2874721 cycles since last wakeup (146.355%).
ouch! we missed one ore more irq[s]
threshold violated: 647431 cycles since last wakeup (44.5171%).
threshold violated: 126309 cycles since last wakeup (89.1757%).
threshold violated: 5817415 cycles since last wakeup (398.535%).
ouch! we missed one ore more irq[s]
threshold violated: 661937 cycles since last wakeup (43.274%).
threshold violated: 4351747 cycles since last wakeup (272.932%).
ouch! we missed one ore more irq[s]
threshold violated: 442189 cycles since last wakeup (62.1057%).
threshold violated: 115427 cycles since last wakeup (90.1083%).
done.
total # of irqs: 50032. missed irq deadlines: 17
mean cycle difference betweem two wakeups: 1.16779e+06 cycles
min. cycle difference betweem two wakeups: 115427 cycles (#: 44584)
diff from mean diff: 1.05237e+06
max. cycle difference betweem two wakeups: 1.03279e+07 cycles (#: 8869)
diff from mean diff: 9.1601e+06
mean difference from mean difference: 6458.8 cycles
~/source/my_projects/wakeup$
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-30 21:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 152+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1099008264.4199.4.camel@krustophenia.net>
2004-10-29 0:57 ` [Fwd: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-mm1-V0.4] Paul Davis
2004-10-29 2:10 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-29 8:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-29 8:21 ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-10-29 9:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-29 11:01 ` Paul Davis
2004-10-29 11:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-29 11:26 ` Paul Davis
2004-10-29 11:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-29 13:35 ` Paul Davis
2004-10-29 13:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-29 14:03 ` Paul Davis
2004-10-29 14:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-29 16:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-29 16:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-29 16:32 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-10-29 16:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-29 16:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-29 16:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-29 16:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-29 17:16 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-10-29 17:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-29 17:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-29 17:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-29 17:33 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-10-29 17:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-29 17:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-29 18:36 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-10-29 20:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-29 20:51 ` Paul Davis
2004-10-29 21:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-30 1:06 ` Paul Davis
2004-10-30 11:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-26 17:16 ` [Jackit-devel] " Jack O'Quin
2004-10-29 20:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-29 21:31 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-10-29 21:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-29 21:42 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-29 21:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-29 21:53 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-29 23:12 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-30 11:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-30 17:49 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-30 19:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-30 19:43 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-30 19:47 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-10-30 19:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-30 19:57 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-10-30 19:52 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-30 20:15 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-10-30 20:26 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-30 21:13 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-10-30 21:26 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-30 21:38 ` Florian Schmidt [this message]
2004-10-30 23:12 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-31 12:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-31 12:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-31 12:54 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-31 13:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-31 13:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-31 15:20 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-10-31 15:59 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-10-31 19:06 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-11-01 13:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-01 13:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-01 14:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-01 15:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-11-01 17:55 ` Lee Revell
2004-11-01 17:58 ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-11-01 18:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-01 18:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-01 22:30 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-11-01 22:40 ` Bill Huey
2004-11-01 22:51 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-11-01 22:59 ` Bill Huey
2004-11-02 8:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-02 8:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-02 15:06 ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-mm1-V0.6.8 Ingo Molnar
2004-11-02 17:52 ` K.R. Foley
2004-11-02 19:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-02 19:40 ` K.R. Foley
2004-11-02 19:24 ` Norberto Bensa
2004-11-02 19:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-02 23:09 ` Karsten Wiese
2004-11-03 1:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-03 10:15 ` Karsten Wiese
2004-11-01 17:04 ` [Fwd: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-mm1-V0.4] Rui Nuno Capela
2004-11-01 17:08 ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-11-01 20:00 ` Rui Nuno Capela
2004-11-01 17:24 ` K.R. Foley
2004-11-02 0:22 ` Michal Schmidt
2004-11-01 13:54 ` Paul Davis
2004-11-01 14:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-01 19:30 ` Paul Davis
2004-11-02 8:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-01 14:03 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-11-01 14:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-01 15:29 ` K.R. Foley
2004-11-02 23:41 ` [Fwd: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-mm1-V0.6] Remi Colinet
2004-11-03 1:04 ` Remi Colinet
2004-11-01 11:55 ` [Fwd: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-mm1-V0.4] Ingo Molnar
2004-11-01 12:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-01 12:35 ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-11-01 12:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-01 13:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-01 13:40 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-11-01 13:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-01 16:47 ` Rui Nuno Capela
2004-10-31 23:16 ` Michal Schmidt
2004-11-01 0:05 ` Magnus Määttä
2004-10-31 13:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-31 14:11 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-10-31 13:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-31 14:28 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-10-31 13:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-31 21:58 ` Rui Nuno Capela
2004-10-31 22:11 ` K.R. Foley
2004-10-31 2:20 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-31 10:00 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-10-31 12:09 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-31 12:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-31 12:35 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-31 12:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-30 20:05 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-30 20:29 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-10-30 0:15 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-29 22:31 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-10-29 22:50 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-10-30 13:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-30 17:53 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-10-30 3:36 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-30 3:48 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-30 11:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-30 17:44 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-30 11:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-30 11:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-30 13:16 ` Florian Schmidt
2004-10-30 1:10 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-30 1:15 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-29 8:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-29 9:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-29 13:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-29 14:19 ` Paul Davis
2004-10-29 14:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-29 14:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-29 14:38 ` Paul Davis
2004-10-29 19:33 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-29 19:35 ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-11-01 14:32 Mark_H_Johnson
2004-11-01 14:36 ` Ingo Molnar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-11-01 16:34 Mark_H_Johnson
2004-11-01 18:48 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041030233849.498fbb0f@mango.fruits.de \
--to=mista.tapas@gmx.net \
--cc=annabellesgarden@yahoo.de \
--cc=bhuey@lnxw.com \
--cc=doogie@debian.org \
--cc=jackit-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark_h_johnson@raytheon.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nando@ccrma.stanford.edu \
--cc=paul@linuxaudiosystems.com \
--cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
--cc=rncbc@rncbc.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=xschmi00@stud.feec.vutbr.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox