From: Gerd Knorr <kraxel@bytesex.org>
To: Blaisorblade <blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it>
Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>, Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@cam.ac.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] UML: Use PTRACE_KILL instead of SIGKILL to kill host-OS processes (take #2)
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 21:18:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041103201836.GB29289@bytesex> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200411032028.44376.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it>
> I'm going to test this. I thought that Gerd Knorr patch (which I sent cc'ing
> LKML and most of you) already solved this (I actually modified that one,
Not sure whenever tt is fixed with my patch, I've tested skas only (I'm
building skas-only dynamically linked kernels these days because due to
working on x11 framebuffer stuff which needs dynamically linked libX11).
So if Chris actually tested TT then his patch probably is ok and needed
as well ...
Gerd
--
#define printk(args...) fprintf(stderr, ## args)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-03 20:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-03 11:37 [PATCH] UML: Use PTRACE_KILL instead of SIGKILL to kill host-OS processes Chris Wedgwood
2004-11-03 11:47 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2004-11-03 12:08 ` [PATCH] UML: Use PTRACE_KILL instead of SIGKILL to kill host-OS processes (take #2) Chris Wedgwood
2004-11-03 19:28 ` [uml-devel] " Blaisorblade
2004-11-03 20:09 ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-11-03 22:51 ` Blaisorblade
2004-11-03 20:18 ` Gerd Knorr [this message]
2004-11-03 20:48 ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-11-04 0:23 ` Blaisorblade
2004-11-03 23:19 ` Blaisorblade
[not found] ` <200411040113.27747.blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it>
[not found] ` <20041104003943.GB17467@taniwha.stupidest.org>
2004-11-04 4:31 ` Fixing UML against NPTL (was: Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH] UML: Use PTRACE_KILL instead of SIGKILL to kill host-OS processes (take #2)) Blaisorblade
2004-11-11 17:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-11-11 18:31 ` Christophe Saout
2004-11-11 18:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-11-12 0:09 ` Blaisorblade
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041103201836.GB29289@bytesex \
--to=kraxel@bytesex.org \
--cc=aia21@cam.ac.uk \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=blaisorblade_spam@yahoo.it \
--cc=cw@f00f.org \
--cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox