public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Schmidt <mista.tapas@gmx.net>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Mark_H_Johnson@raytheon.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>,
	Paul Davis <paul@linuxaudiosystems.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Bill Huey <bhuey@lnxw.com>,
	Adam Heath <doogie@debian.org>,
	Michal Schmidt <xschmi00@stud.feec.vutbr.cz>,
	Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano <nando@ccrma.stanford.edu>,
	Karsten Wiese <annabellesgarden@yahoo.de>,
	jackit-devel <jackit-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	Rui Nuno Capela <rncbc@rncbc.org>, "K.R. Foley" <kr@cybsft.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-mm1-V0.6.8
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 20:51:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041103205121.0184a9c7@mango.fruits.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041103123935.GA7865@elte.hu>

On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 13:39:35 +0100
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:

> 
> > > the patch below should fix this deadlock but there might be others
> > > around ...
> > 
> > the patch doesnt work. Working on a better solution.
> 
> this hopefully better solution is included in -V0.7.1.

Hi, 

i tried V0.7.7 and since all other RP kernels locked for me in X, i decided
to go to the console and try to see if i get some debugging output. Well i
put the usual stress on the system but besides some higher rtc_wakeup
jitters [up to 60%] which didn't show during the earlier runs that locked
when in X, the system ran fine. i wasn't able to lock the system from within
the console (X was started but idling at gdm).

Ok, so i suspected, maybe the locks i see got to do with X, so i changed to
the X console, logged in and quicklky switched back to the console. and no
surprise 10seconds later or so it locked (i suppose gnome was still loading
at that point in time). Without any console output. Does it matter which
virtual text console one is on? i thought not.

anyways. i might just get myself a serial console in a few days (old pc
froma buddy). but i thought a serial console would be mostly useful to
capture more of the debug messages. if none shows at all it won't help
either right?

flo

  reply	other threads:[~2004-11-03 19:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-11-02 22:35 [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-mm1-V0.6.8 Mark_H_Johnson
2004-11-03  8:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-03  8:42   ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-03 10:00     ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-03 12:39       ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-03 19:51         ` Florian Schmidt [this message]
2004-11-03 23:02           ` Adam Heath
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-11-02 21:39 Mark_H_Johnson
2004-11-02 20:42 Mark_H_Johnson
2004-11-02 21:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-02 18:00 Mark_H_Johnson
2004-11-02 19:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-02 19:27   ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-02 22:04     ` K.R. Foley
2004-11-03  2:54     ` Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano
2004-11-03  3:45       ` K.R. Foley
2004-11-02 15:44 Mark_H_Johnson
2004-11-02 19:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-02 19:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-31 12:54 [Fwd: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-mm1-V0.4] Lee Revell
2004-10-31 13:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-31 13:40   ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-31 15:20     ` Florian Schmidt
2004-10-31 15:59       ` Florian Schmidt
2004-10-31 19:06         ` Florian Schmidt
2004-11-01 13:42           ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-01 13:53             ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-01 14:06               ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-01 15:47                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-11-02 15:06                   ` [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.9-mm1-V0.6.8 Ingo Molnar
2004-11-02 17:52                     ` K.R. Foley
2004-11-02 19:37                       ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-02 19:40                         ` K.R. Foley
2004-11-02 19:24                     ` Norberto Bensa
2004-11-02 19:35                       ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-02 23:09                     ` Karsten Wiese
2004-11-03  1:12                       ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-03 10:15                         ` Karsten Wiese

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20041103205121.0184a9c7@mango.fruits.de \
    --to=mista.tapas@gmx.net \
    --cc=Mark_H_Johnson@raytheon.com \
    --cc=annabellesgarden@yahoo.de \
    --cc=bhuey@lnxw.com \
    --cc=doogie@debian.org \
    --cc=jackit-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=kr@cybsft.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=nando@ccrma.stanford.edu \
    --cc=paul@linuxaudiosystems.com \
    --cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
    --cc=rncbc@rncbc.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=xschmi00@stud.feec.vutbr.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox