From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261677AbUKGTVa (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Nov 2004 14:21:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261679AbUKGTVa (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Nov 2004 14:21:30 -0500 Received: from smtpout6.uol.com.br ([200.221.11.59]:55032 "EHLO smtp.uol.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261677AbUKGTV1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Nov 2004 14:21:27 -0500 Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2004 17:21:02 -0200 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Rog=E9rio?= Brito To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Oops with kernel 2.6.9-ac6 Message-ID: <20041107192102.GA6423@ime.usp.br> Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20041104232704.GA7721@ime.usp.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20041104232704.GA7721@ime.usp.br> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Nov 04 2004, Rogério Brito wrote: > Dear kernel developers (and Alan Cox in particular), > > I've been having problems with recent kernels (some instability > on a system that has been rock solid for years). I'm using a Debian testing > system here with my own compiled kernel. (...) After running memtest86+, I discovered that the instability was due to a faulty memory module. Now, running without that memory module, the machine is again rock stable with 2.6.9-ac6 (but, unfortunately, quite slower). Sorry for the red herring, Rogério Brito. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Rogério Brito - rbrito@ime.usp.br - http://www.ime.usp.br/~rbrito =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=