From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261496AbUKJIty (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Nov 2004 03:49:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261523AbUKJIty (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Nov 2004 03:49:54 -0500 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:57054 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261496AbUKJIto (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Nov 2004 03:49:44 -0500 Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 09:49:09 +0100 From: Jens Axboe To: Larry McVoy , Geert Uytterhoeven , Larry McVoy , Linux Kernel Development Subject: Re: bk-commits: diff -p? Message-ID: <20041110084908.GG5602@suse.de> References: <20041108164302.GA489@work.bitmover.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041108164302.GA489@work.bitmover.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 08 2004, Larry McVoy wrote: > This has been fixed in the following releases: > > bk-3.2.3 > bk-3.2.2c > bk-3.2.2b > > Correct usage is "bk diffs -up" which will get you unified + procedural diffs. > -p is currently a hack, it implies -u, but don't depend on that behaviour, > a future release does this correctly and if you teach your fingers that > diffs -p is the same as diffs -up you'll get burned later. Thanks! I requested this about a year ago :-) -- Jens Axboe