public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@osdl.org
Subject: Re: x86: only single-step into signal handlers if the tracer
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 18:44:56 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041114184456.6bfd07d3.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41981266.2070707@pobox.com>

Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com> wrote:
>
> Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
> > ChangeSet 1.2159, 2004/11/15 00:56:31-08:00, torvalds@ppc970.osdl.org
> > 
> > 	x86: only single-step into signal handlers if the tracer
> > 	asked for it.
> 
> 
> This reminds me of a problem I am seeing under recent -bk kernels.
> 
> Mozilla (FC2) will freeze (no screen redraws, etc.).  'ps xf' shows 
> mozilla sleeping.  If I strace the process, Mozilla will un-freeze and 
> continue as expected.
> 

Presumably the futex thing:


diff -puN kernel/futex.c~revert-futex_wait-fix kernel/futex.c
--- 25/kernel/futex.c~revert-futex_wait-fix	2004-11-14 18:43:56.841300400 -0800
+++ 25-akpm/kernel/futex.c	2004-11-14 18:43:56.845299792 -0800
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
  *  (C) Copyright 2003 Red Hat Inc, All Rights Reserved
  *
  *  Removed page pinning, fix privately mapped COW pages and other cleanups
- *  (C) Copyright 2003 Jamie Lokier
+ *  (C) Copyright 2003, 2004 Jamie Lokier
  *
  *  Thanks to Ben LaHaise for yelling "hashed waitqueues" loudly
  *  enough at me, Linus for the original (flawed) idea, Matthew
@@ -486,22 +486,37 @@ static int futex_wait(unsigned long uadd
 	if (unlikely(ret != 0))
 		goto out_release_sem;
 
+	queue_me(&q, -1, NULL);
+
 	/*
-	 * Access the page after the futex is queued.
+	 * Access the page AFTER the futex is queued.
+	 * Order is important:
+	 *
+	 *   Userspace waiter: val = var; if (cond(val)) futex_wait(&var, val);
+	 *   Userspace waker:  if (cond(var)) { var = new; futex_wake(&var); }
+	 *
+	 * The basic logical guarantee of a futex is that it blocks ONLY
+	 * if cond(var) is known to be true at the time of blocking, for
+	 * any cond.  If we queued after testing *uaddr, that would open
+	 * a race condition where we could block indefinitely with
+	 * cond(var) false, which would violate the guarantee.
+	 *
+	 * A consequence is that futex_wait() can return zero and absorb
+	 * a wakeup when *uaddr != val on entry to the syscall.  This is
+	 * rare, but normal.
+	 *
 	 * We hold the mmap semaphore, so the mapping cannot have changed
-	 * since we looked it up.
+	 * since we looked it up in get_futex_key.
 	 */
 	if (get_user(curval, (int __user *)uaddr) != 0) {
 		ret = -EFAULT;
-		goto out_release_sem;
+		goto out_unqueue;
 	}
 	if (curval != val) {
 		ret = -EWOULDBLOCK;
-		goto out_release_sem;
+		goto out_unqueue;
 	}
 
-	queue_me(&q, -1, NULL);
-
 	/*
 	 * Now the futex is queued and we have checked the data, we
 	 * don't want to hold mmap_sem while we sleep.
@@ -542,10 +557,11 @@ static int futex_wait(unsigned long uadd
 	WARN_ON(!signal_pending(current));
 	return -EINTR;
 
+ out_unqueue:
 	/* If we were woken (and unqueued), we succeeded, whatever. */
 	if (!unqueue_me(&q))
 		ret = 0;
-out_release_sem:
+ out_release_sem:
 	up_read(&current->mm->mmap_sem);
 	return ret;
 }
_


  reply	other threads:[~2004-11-15  2:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <200411150203.iAF23Trb024677@hera.kernel.org>
2004-11-15  2:20 ` x86: only single-step into signal handlers if the tracer Jeff Garzik
2004-11-15  2:44   ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2004-11-15 12:10     ` Alexander Nyberg
2004-11-18 15:42 ` [PATCH 2.6.10-rc2] x86_64: only single-step into signal handlers if the tracer asked for it Tom Rini
2004-11-18 20:46   ` [discuss] " Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20041114184456.6bfd07d3.akpm@osdl.org \
    --to=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox