From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262524AbUKQUxO (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Nov 2004 15:53:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262403AbUKQUuu (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Nov 2004 15:50:50 -0500 Received: from holomorphy.com ([207.189.100.168]:55755 "EHLO holomorphy.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262531AbUKQUuj (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Nov 2004 15:50:39 -0500 Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 12:50:24 -0800 From: William Lee Irwin III To: Grzegorz Piotr Jaskiewicz Cc: kernel list Subject: Re: pid_max madness Message-ID: <20041117205024.GT3217@holomorphy.com> References: <419BB097.8030405@kde.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <419BB097.8030405@kde.org.uk> Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 09:12:07PM +0100, Grzegorz Piotr Jaskiewicz wrote: > Let's do: > #echo "-1" >/proc/sys/kernel/pid_max > #cat /proc/sys/kernel/pid_max > -1 > # > Madness, isn't ? > I guess that isn't what author ment it to behave like. > Anyway, does it mean that after max unsigned value is reached pids are > going to be negative in value ?? Kernel version please? -- wli