From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263020AbUKRVfN (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Nov 2004 16:35:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263011AbUKRVeS (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Nov 2004 16:34:18 -0500 Received: from emailhub.stusta.mhn.de ([141.84.69.5]:14096 "HELO mailout.stusta.mhn.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S262982AbUKRVch (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Nov 2004 16:32:37 -0500 Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 22:32:32 +0100 From: Adrian Bunk To: Nicolas Pitre Cc: David Woodhouse , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [patch] 2.6.10-rc2-mm2: MTD_XIP dependencies Message-ID: <20041118213232.GG4943@stusta.de> References: <20041118021538.5764d58c.akpm@osdl.org> <20041118154110.GE4943@stusta.de> <1100793112.8191.7315.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 11:34:56AM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Thu, 18 Nov 2004, David Woodhouse wrote: > > > On Thu, 2004-11-18 at 16:41 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > Let's put the dependencies from the #error into the Kconfig file: > > > > Looks sane to me. Nico? > > And why is the current arrangement actually a problem? If you are able to select an option, it should also compile (and work). At least on i386, this is usually true for every single option. > Nicolas cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed