Re: RFC: let x86_64 no longer define X86

Adrian Bunk
2004-11-19T01:23:57Z

On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 12:14:06PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> >And if you want to support both older and more recent kernels, the
> >following dependencies will be correct both before and after this
> >change:
> >- (X86 && !X86_64)
> >- (X86 && X86_64)
> >
>
> This last one surely can't be correct before *and* afterwards. But even in
> the current system, it is a pretty perverse thing to check for. I guess you
> meant:
>
> (X86 || X86_64)

Yes, thanks for the correcting my typo.

cu
Adrian

--

"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed