Re: [discuss] Re: RFC: let x86_64 no longer define X86

Andi Kleen
2004-11-19T12:27:03Z

On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 11:50:50AM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-11-19 at 12:55 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 11:28:20AM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > > Can you show some examples? We don't have this for any other
> > > architecture.
> >
> > Just grep for any use of X86 in Kconfig.
>
> OK, I'll pick the first I find...
>
> config ATP
> tristate "AT-LAN-TEC/RealTek pocket adapter support"
> depends on NET_POCKET && ISA && X86
>
> Why is that OK on x86_64 but not Alpha? Why isn't the use of X86 a bug
> in that case?

I don't know details about the driver, but it's not enabled on x86-64
because x86-64 doesn't have ISA set.

-Andi