The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org,
	davem@davemloft.net, prasanna@in.ibm.com, suparna@in.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Kprobes: wrapper to define jprobe.entry
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 14:33:56 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041119090356.GA10082@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041118230506.4d20b3c9.akpm@osdl.org>

On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 11:05:06PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > > >
> >  > > Here is a patch that adds a wrapper for defining jprobe.entry to make
> >  > > it easy to handle the three dword function descriptors defined by the
> >  > > PowerPC ELF ABI.
> >  > > 
> >  > > Current patch against 2.6.10-rc2-mm1 + kprobes patch for ppc64.
> >  > 
> >  > I don't have the kprobes-for-ppc64 patch here.
> >  > 
> >  > > Changes for adding this wrapper for x86, ppc64 (tested) and x86_64 
> >  > > (untested) below. The earlier method of defining jprobe.entry will
> >  > > continue to work.
> >  > 
> >  > So what should I do with this?  I'm inclined to drop it until the x86_64
> >  > part has been tested and Dave has had a go at the sparc64 version.
> > 
> >  I have now tested the patch succesfully on x86_64 and updated it for
> >  sparc64 too (Dave says the change looks good).
> 
> What is the review and testing status of the kprobes-for-ppc64 patch which
> you sent?
> 
The patch was earlier posted on the PPC64 mailing list for comments and 
Paul had reviewed it. I had to update the patch to take care of the base 
kprobe changes that were made to accomodate the x86_64 port.

The patch is tested on POWER3 (uni) and POWER4 (lpar).

Thanks,
Ananth

      reply	other threads:[~2004-11-19  9:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-11-18 10:26 [PATCH] Kprobes: wrapper to define jprobe.entry Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2004-11-18 22:47 ` Andrew Morton
2004-11-18 22:43   ` David S. Miller
2004-11-19  6:52   ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2004-11-19  7:05     ` Andrew Morton
2004-11-19  9:03       ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20041119090356.GA10082@in.ibm.com \
    --to=ananth@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=prasanna@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=suparna@in.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox