From: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org,
davem@davemloft.net, prasanna@in.ibm.com, suparna@in.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Kprobes: wrapper to define jprobe.entry
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 14:33:56 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041119090356.GA10082@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041118230506.4d20b3c9.akpm@osdl.org>
On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 11:05:06PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > > >
> > > > Here is a patch that adds a wrapper for defining jprobe.entry to make
> > > > it easy to handle the three dword function descriptors defined by the
> > > > PowerPC ELF ABI.
> > > >
> > > > Current patch against 2.6.10-rc2-mm1 + kprobes patch for ppc64.
> > >
> > > I don't have the kprobes-for-ppc64 patch here.
> > >
> > > > Changes for adding this wrapper for x86, ppc64 (tested) and x86_64
> > > > (untested) below. The earlier method of defining jprobe.entry will
> > > > continue to work.
> > >
> > > So what should I do with this? I'm inclined to drop it until the x86_64
> > > part has been tested and Dave has had a go at the sparc64 version.
> >
> > I have now tested the patch succesfully on x86_64 and updated it for
> > sparc64 too (Dave says the change looks good).
>
> What is the review and testing status of the kprobes-for-ppc64 patch which
> you sent?
>
The patch was earlier posted on the PPC64 mailing list for comments and
Paul had reviewed it. I had to update the patch to take care of the base
kprobe changes that were made to accomodate the x86_64 port.
The patch is tested on POWER3 (uni) and POWER4 (lpar).
Thanks,
Ananth
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-19 9:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-18 10:26 [PATCH] Kprobes: wrapper to define jprobe.entry Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2004-11-18 22:47 ` Andrew Morton
2004-11-18 22:43 ` David S. Miller
2004-11-19 6:52 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2004-11-19 7:05 ` Andrew Morton
2004-11-19 9:03 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041119090356.GA10082@in.ibm.com \
--to=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=prasanna@in.ibm.com \
--cc=suparna@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox