Re: sparse segfaults

Duncan Sands
2004-11-22T20:50:58Z

> I suspect (but don't have any real argument to back that up) is that the
> gcc "extended lvalues" fell out as a side effect from how gcc ended up
> doing some random semantic tree parsing, and it wasn't really "designed"
> per se, as much as just a random implementation detail. Then somebody
> noticed it, and said "cool" and documented it.

Generalized lvalues have been removed. Check out
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2004-11/msg00604.html

All the best,

Duncan.