From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261806AbUKUVK6 (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Nov 2004 16:10:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261809AbUKUVK5 (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Nov 2004 16:10:57 -0500 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:5794 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261806AbUKUVKz (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Nov 2004 16:10:55 -0500 Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 13:10:38 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: ptb@inv.it.uc3m.es Cc: ptb@it.uc3m.es, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: can kfree sleep? Message-Id: <20041121131038.6c55b91c.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <200411211223.iALCNCTL005995@betty.it.uc3m.es> References: <200411211223.iALCNCTL005995@betty.it.uc3m.es> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Peter T. Breuer" wrote: > > Just a question: can kfree sleep? Nope. All memory freeing codepaths are atomic and may be called from any context except NMI handlers.