From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
To: Daniel_Weigert@adp.com
Cc: jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Kernel 2.6.9 SCSI driver compile error w/gcc-3.4.2.
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 19:44:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041124184459.GE19873@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2D1DF9BA9166D61188F30002B3A6E15318E4D826@ROSEEXCHMA>
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 01:35:37PM -0500, Daniel_Weigert@adp.com wrote:
> >> SNIP <<
>
> >> root@p500b:/usr/src/linux# make modules
> >> CHK include/linux/version.h
> >> make[1]: `arch/i386/kernel/asm-offsets.s' is up to date.
> >> CC [M] drivers/scsi/cpqfcTScontrol.o
> >> drivers/scsi/cpqfcTScontrol.c:609:2: #error This is too much stack
> >> drivers/scsi/cpqfcTScontrol.c:721:2: #error This is too much stack
> >> make[2]: *** [drivers/scsi/cpqfcTScontrol.o] Error 1
> >>...
>
> >> SNIP <<
> > It's known that some drivers do not compile and marked in the Kconfig
> > files. But if you choose to try to compile them anyway, they don't
> > compile.
> > cu
> >Adrian
>
> The problem that I have with this, isn't that the driver is broken (it works
> under 2.4), It isn't labeled as broken in the menuconfig, if you choose the
> option to include the dubious drivers. Unfortunately, I do need this
It's marked as BROKEN, and if you choose the option to enable broken
drivers, you are offered to compile broken drivers.
> particular driver and hope someone steps up to the plate to take care of it.
If this is the only problem in this driver, the fix wasn't too hard.
But considering how long this problem is unfixed, the driver doesn't
seem to be in a good shape...
> Dan
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-25 2:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-24 18:35 Kernel 2.6.9 SCSI driver compile error w/gcc-3.4.2 Daniel_Weigert
2004-11-24 18:44 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-11-24 13:13 Justin Piszcz
2004-11-24 17:03 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-11-24 17:05 ` Justin Piszcz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041124184459.GE19873@stusta.de \
--to=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=Daniel_Weigert@adp.com \
--cc=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox