Re: file as a directory

[Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>]

Hi!

> Such support may happen for a few fs'es - people who
> want this will then use those fses.  Those who don't
> like the ideas will use others.
> 
> >(.tar, .tar.gz, ...) support in the VFS itself, and of course
> >transparent to any fs and any user-land application. There are many
> >archive FSs around, but how feasible would it be to implement the
> >archive file support in the VFS at dentry-level? I'd be happy to share
> >my proposal.
> >
> > 
> >
> You won't get .tar or .tar.gz support in the VFS, for a few simple reasons:
> 1. .tar and .tar.gz are complicated formats, and are therefore better
>   left to userland.  You can get some of the same effect by using a shared
>   library that redefines fopen() and fread() though.  It'll work fine for
>   the vast majority of apps that happens to use the C library.

It is not same effect -- with shared library you get no caching. And
that hurts a lot.

>   It is hard to make a guaranteed bug-free decompressor that
>   is efficient and works with a finite amount of memory.  The kernel
>   needs all that - userland doesn't.

If you have bug in decompressor, you are screwed, anyway, because you
get remote user exploit when mozilla gets the file from
web. Oops. [Ok, you at least do not get remote root exploit, but...]

								Pavel 
-- 
People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!