From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262785AbUK0CCv (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Nov 2004 21:02:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262977AbUKZTiC (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Nov 2004 14:38:02 -0500 Received: from zeus.kernel.org ([204.152.189.113]:55234 "EHLO zeus.kernel.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261223AbUKZT0B (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Nov 2004 14:26:01 -0500 Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 19:36:14 -0500 From: Dorn Hetzel To: Francois Romieu Cc: Dorn Hetzel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com, jgarzik@pobox.com Subject: Re: r8169.c Message-ID: <20041126003614.GA5441@lilah.hetzel.org> References: <20041119162920.GA26836@lilah.hetzel.org> <20041119201203.GA13522@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> <20041120003754.GA32133@lilah.hetzel.org> <20041120002946.GA18059@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> <20041122181307.GA3625@lilah.hetzel.org> <20041123144901.GA19005@lilah.hetzel.org> <20041123194740.GA32210@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> <20041125220233.GA23850@lilah.hetzel.org> <20041125205411.GA3204@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041125205411.GA3204@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org It did *build* well enough not to blow up the kernel build with 2.95.4, it just failed in use... On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 09:54:11PM +0100, Francois Romieu wrote: > Dorn Hetzel : > [...] > > I went ahead and remotely rebuilt using gcc 2.95.4 and upon reboot it > > worked long enough to ssh in and then it failed. So it sounds like the > > version of gcc DOES make a difference :) > > Ok, I'll have to audit the driver for the typical inline assembler + > arithmetic ops which 2.95.x dislikes. > > -- > Ueimor