From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Esben Nielsen <simlo@phys.au.dk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Priority Inheritance Test (Real-Time Preemption)
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 16:57:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041129155752.GA17828@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041129155642.GA17663@elte.hu>
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
> > iteration over a list which can be O(number of waiters * locking
> > depth) long. As long as we are in the kernel both is "controlled",
> > i.e. one can see the worst-case number in stress test and know it
> > can't get worse. *
>
> which list do you mean? Note that the pi_list depends on the number of
> _RT-tasks_, not on the number of SCHED_NORMAL tasks. So you can create
> an arbitrary number of SCHED_NORMAL tasks, they wont impact the
> overhead of mutexes!
>
> i very intentionally made it independent of nr-of-non-RT-tasks.
and i'm regularly testing this property with 'hackbench 50', which
creates over a 1000 wildly scheduling non-RT tasks. Latency is not
affected by such workloads.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-29 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-21 20:29 Priority Inheritance Test (Real-Time Preemption) Esben Nielsen
2004-11-22 0:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-23 13:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-23 15:47 ` Esben Nielsen
2004-11-23 23:03 ` Esben Nielsen
2004-11-24 3:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-24 7:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-24 8:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-24 8:33 ` Esben Nielsen
2004-11-24 9:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-24 10:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-25 15:46 ` Esben Nielsen
2004-11-25 16:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-25 16:08 ` Esben Nielsen
2004-11-25 17:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-25 22:08 ` Esben Nielsen
2004-11-26 1:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-26 0:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-26 0:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-26 8:52 ` Esben Nielsen
2004-11-26 16:26 ` Esben Nielsen
2004-11-26 20:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-26 21:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-27 23:05 ` Esben Nielsen
2004-11-28 8:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-28 15:55 ` Esben Nielsen
2004-11-29 9:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-29 15:07 ` Esben Nielsen
2004-11-29 15:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-29 15:57 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2004-11-29 16:50 ` Esben Nielsen
2004-11-30 8:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-22 9:23 ` Bill Huey
2004-11-22 12:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-22 21:25 ` Bill Huey
2004-11-22 14:16 ` john cooper
2004-11-22 15:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-23 1:19 ` john cooper
2004-11-23 8:13 ` Esben Nielsen
2004-11-23 9:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-11-22 21:30 ` Bill Huey
2004-11-23 1:34 ` john cooper
2004-11-22 16:12 ` Esben Nielsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041129155752.GA17828@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=simlo@phys.au.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox