From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261336AbULAJD1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Dec 2004 04:03:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261339AbULAJD1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Dec 2004 04:03:27 -0500 Received: from mx2.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:17371 "EHLO mx2.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261336AbULAJDX (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Dec 2004 04:03:23 -0500 Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 10:02:20 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Mark_H_Johnson@Raytheon.com Cc: Amit Shah , Karsten Wiese , Bill Huey , Adam Heath , emann@mrv.com, Gunther Persoons , "K.R. Foley" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rui Nuno Capela , Florian Schmidt , Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano , Lee Revell , Shane Shrybman , Esben Nielsen , Thomas Gleixner , Michal Schmidt Subject: Re: Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc2-mm3-V0.7.31-7 Message-ID: <20041201090220.GE15928@elte.hu> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-ELTE-SpamVersion: MailScanner 4.31.6-itk1 (ELTE 1.2) SpamAssassin 2.63 ClamAV 0.73 X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-4.9, required 5.9, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -4.90 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamScore: -4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Mark_H_Johnson@Raytheon.com wrote: > I have results from two builds of -V0.7.31-9. The first build is > CONFIG_RT (RT) and the second is CONFIG_DESKTOP (PK or as described in > .config help - Preempt Kernel). interesting numbers. The slowdown in networking could easily be due to IRQ and softirq threading, so it would make sense to also add a "PNT" test (preempt, non-threaded), just to have something functionally comparable to 2.4 lowlat+preempt. Ingo