public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] oom killer (Core)
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 04:36:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041202033619.GA32635@dualathlon.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1101938767.13353.62.camel@tglx.tec.linutronix.de>

Could you please test this? Perhaps it won't be as effective as the
hacks I nuked, but it fixed basic things for me in a quick test so I
like it more. It's important to use pages_high to avoid livelocks.

Thanks.

Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>

Index: x/mm/oom_kill.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/andrea/crypto/cvs/linux-2.5/mm/oom_kill.c,v
retrieving revision 1.31
diff -u -p -r1.31 oom_kill.c
--- x/mm/oom_kill.c	14 Oct 2004 04:27:49 -0000	1.31
+++ x/mm/oom_kill.c	2 Dec 2004 03:34:05 -0000
@@ -229,72 +229,8 @@ retry:
  */
 void out_of_memory(int gfp_mask)
 {
-	/*
-	 * oom_lock protects out_of_memory()'s static variables.
-	 * It's a global lock; this is not performance-critical.
-	 */
-	static spinlock_t oom_lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
-	static unsigned long first, last, count, lastkill;
-	unsigned long now, since;
-
-	spin_lock(&oom_lock);
-	now = jiffies;
-	since = now - last;
-	last = now;
-
-	/*
-	 * If it's been a long time since last failure,
-	 * we're not oom.
-	 */
-	if (since > 5*HZ)
-		goto reset;
-
-	/*
-	 * If we haven't tried for at least one second,
-	 * we're not really oom.
-	 */
-	since = now - first;
-	if (since < HZ)
-		goto out_unlock;
-
-	/*
-	 * If we have gotten only a few failures,
-	 * we're not really oom. 
-	 */
-	if (++count < 10)
-		goto out_unlock;
-
-	/*
-	 * If we just killed a process, wait a while
-	 * to give that task a chance to exit. This
-	 * avoids killing multiple processes needlessly.
-	 */
-	since = now - lastkill;
-	if (since < HZ*5)
-		goto out_unlock;
-
-	/*
-	 * Ok, really out of memory. Kill something.
-	 */
-	lastkill = now;
-
 	printk("oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x%x\n", gfp_mask);
 	show_free_areas();
-
-	/* oom_kill() sleeps */
-	spin_unlock(&oom_lock);
+	dump_stack();
 	oom_kill();
-	spin_lock(&oom_lock);
-
-reset:
-	/*
-	 * We dropped the lock above, so check to be sure the variable
-	 * first only ever increases to prevent false OOM's.
-	 */
-	if (time_after(now, first))
-		first = now;
-	count = 0;
-
-out_unlock:
-	spin_unlock(&oom_lock);
 }
Index: x/mm/page_alloc.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/andrea/crypto/cvs/linux-2.5/mm/page_alloc.c,v
retrieving revision 1.236
diff -u -p -r1.236 page_alloc.c
--- x/mm/page_alloc.c	16 Nov 2004 03:53:53 -0000	1.236
+++ x/mm/page_alloc.c	2 Dec 2004 02:21:18 -0000
@@ -611,6 +611,7 @@ __alloc_pages(unsigned int gfp_mask, uns
 	int alloc_type;
 	int do_retry;
 	int can_try_harder;
+	int did_some_progress;
 
 	might_sleep_if(wait);
 
@@ -686,18 +687,19 @@ rebalance:
 	reclaim_state.reclaimed_slab = 0;
 	p->reclaim_state = &reclaim_state;
 
-	try_to_free_pages(zones, gfp_mask, order);
+	did_some_progress = try_to_free_pages(zones, gfp_mask, order);
 
 	p->reclaim_state = NULL;
 	p->flags &= ~PF_MEMALLOC;
 
-	/* go through the zonelist yet one more time */
+	/*
+	 * Go through the zonelist yet one more time, keep
+	 * very high watermark here, this is only to catch
+	 * a parallel oom killing, we must fail if we're still
+	 * under heavy pressure.
+	 */
 	for (i = 0; (z = zones[i]) != NULL; i++) {
-		min = z->pages_min;
-		if (gfp_mask & __GFP_HIGH)
-			min /= 2;
-		if (can_try_harder)
-			min -= min / 4;
+		min = z->pages_high;
 		min += (1<<order) + z->protection[alloc_type];
 
 		if (z->free_pages < min)
@@ -708,6 +710,9 @@ rebalance:
 			goto got_pg;
 	}
 
+	if (unlikely(!did_some_progress) && (gfp_mask & __GFP_FS) && !(gfp_mask & __GFP_NORETRY))
+		out_of_memory(gfp_mask);
+
 	/*
 	 * Don't let big-order allocations loop unless the caller explicitly
 	 * requests that.  Wait for some write requests to complete then retry.
Index: x/mm/vmscan.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/andrea/crypto/cvs/linux-2.5/mm/vmscan.c,v
retrieving revision 1.225
diff -u -p -r1.225 vmscan.c
--- x/mm/vmscan.c	19 Nov 2004 22:54:22 -0000	1.225
+++ x/mm/vmscan.c	2 Dec 2004 01:56:50 -0000
@@ -935,8 +935,6 @@ int try_to_free_pages(struct zone **zone
 		if (sc.nr_scanned && priority < DEF_PRIORITY - 2)
 			blk_congestion_wait(WRITE, HZ/10);
 	}
-	if ((gfp_mask & __GFP_FS) && !(gfp_mask & __GFP_NORETRY))
-		out_of_memory(gfp_mask);
 out:
 	for (i = 0; zones[i] != 0; i++)
 		zones[i]->prev_priority = zones[i]->temp_priority;

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-12-02  3:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-12-01  9:49 [PATCH] oom killer (Core) tglx
2004-12-01 21:16 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-12-01 22:06   ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-12-01 22:33     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-12-02  3:36     ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2004-12-02 11:09       ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-12-02 13:48         ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-12-02 16:47           ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-12-02 16:55             ` Andrew Morton
2004-12-02 11:18               ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-12-02 17:17               ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-12-02 17:27                 ` Andrew Morton
2004-12-02 18:08               ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-12-02 18:29                 ` Andrew Morton
2004-12-02 19:01                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-12-02 18:55                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-12-02 19:07                   ` Andrew Morton
2004-12-02 19:08                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-12-02 19:22                       ` Andrew Morton
2004-12-02 19:24                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-12-02 20:11                           ` Andre Tomt
2004-12-03 22:45                             ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-12-02 23:47                           ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-12-03 14:41                           ` Helge Hafting
2004-12-03 21:20                             ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-12-05 21:14                               ` Helge Hafting
2004-12-02 23:35                   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-12-03  2:28                     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-12-03 22:37                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-12-03 22:51                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-12-03 23:08                           ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-12-10 16:36                       ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-12-10 17:35                         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-12-10 17:43                           ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-12-10 17:55                             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-12-10 18:00                               ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-12-10 18:15                                 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-12-10 18:19                                   ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-12-10 19:05                                     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-12-10 16:51                       ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-12-03 21:10                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-12-03 22:21                       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-12-05  2:52 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-12-05 13:38   ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-12-05 15:22     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-12-10 16:32 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-12-10 16:52   ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-12-10 17:43     ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-12-10 17:47     ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-12-10 17:49     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-12-10 17:57       ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-12-12  0:12         ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-12-24  1:18     ` Andrea Arcangeli
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-12-01 10:21 tvrtko.ursulin
2004-12-04  7:00 Voluspa
2004-12-04  8:08 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-12-04 12:42 Voluspa
2004-12-04 16:43 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-12-04 18:33   ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-12-04 21:02     ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-12-05  0:27       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-12-05 14:55         ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-12-05 15:34           ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-12-05 16:29             ` Thomas Gleixner
2004-12-05  2:22 Voluspa
2004-12-05  8:32 Voluspa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20041202033619.GA32635@dualathlon.random \
    --to=andrea@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox