From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Giuliano Pochini <pochini@denise.shiny.it>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Time sliced CFQ io scheduler
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 15:41:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041202144129.GI10458@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0412021517070.3471@denise.shiny.it>
On Thu, Dec 02 2004, Giuliano Pochini wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 2 Dec 2004, Jens Axboe wrote:
>
> > Case 4: write_files, random, bs=4k
>
> Just a thought... in this test the results don't look right. Why
> aggregate bandwidth with 8 clients is higher than with 4 and 2 clients ?
> In the cfq test with 8 clients aggregate bw is also higher than with
> a single client.
I don't know what happens with the 4 client case, but it's not that
unlikely that aggregate bandwidth will be higher for more threads doing
random writes, as request coalesching will help minimize seeks.
But I did think it was strange with the 4 client case dip was strange,
it was reproducable though (as are all the results, they have very
little variance).
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-02 14:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-02 13:04 Time sliced CFQ io scheduler Jens Axboe
2004-12-02 13:48 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-02 19:48 ` Andrew Morton
2004-12-02 19:52 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-02 20:19 ` Andrew Morton
2004-12-02 20:19 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-02 20:34 ` Andrew Morton
2004-12-02 20:37 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-07 23:11 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-02 22:18 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-12-03 7:01 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-03 9:12 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-12-03 9:18 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-03 9:35 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-12-03 9:43 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-03 9:26 ` Andrew Morton
2004-12-03 9:34 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-12-03 9:39 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-03 9:54 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
[not found] ` <41B03722.5090001@gmx.de>
2004-12-03 10:31 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-03 10:38 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-03 10:45 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-12-03 10:48 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-03 11:27 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-12-03 11:29 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-03 11:52 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2004-12-08 0:37 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-12-08 0:54 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-08 1:37 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-12-08 1:47 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-08 2:09 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-12-08 2:11 ` Andrew Morton
2004-12-08 2:22 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-12-08 6:52 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-08 2:00 ` Andrew Morton
2004-12-08 2:08 ` Andrew Morton
2004-12-08 6:55 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-08 2:20 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-12-08 2:25 ` Andrew Morton
2004-12-08 2:33 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-12-08 2:33 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-08 2:51 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-12-08 3:02 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-08 6:58 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-08 7:14 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-08 7:20 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-08 7:29 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-08 7:32 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-08 7:30 ` Andrew Morton
2004-12-08 7:36 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-08 13:48 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-08 6:55 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-08 7:08 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-08 7:11 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-08 7:19 ` Nick Piggin
2004-12-08 7:26 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-08 9:35 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-08 10:08 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-08 12:47 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-08 10:52 ` Helge Hafting
2004-12-08 10:49 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-08 6:49 ` Jens Axboe
2004-12-02 14:28 ` Giuliano Pochini
2004-12-02 14:41 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2004-12-04 13:05 ` Giuliano Pochini
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-12-03 20:52 Chuck Ebbert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041202144129.GI10458@suse.de \
--to=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pochini@denise.shiny.it \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox