From: Herbert Poetzl <herbert@13thfloor.at>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: do_posix_clock_monotonic_gettime() returns negative nsec
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 03:03:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041203020357.GA28468@mail.13thfloor.at> (raw)
Hi Folks!
recent kernels (tested 2.6.10-rc2 and 2.6.10-rc2-bk15)
produce funny output in /proc/uptime like this:
# cat /proc/uptime
12.4294967218 9.05
# cat /proc/uptime
13.4294967251 10.33
# cat /proc/uptime
14.4294967295 11.73
a short investigation of the issue, ended at
do_posix_clock_monotonic_gettime() which can (and
often does) return negative nsec values (within
one second), so while the actual 'time' returned
is correct, some parts of the kernel assume that
those part is within the range (0 - NSEC_PER_SEC)
len = sprintf(page,"%lu.%02lu %lu.%02lu\n",
(unsigned long) uptime.tv_sec,
(uptime.tv_nsec / (NSEC_PER_SEC / 100)),
as the function itself corrects overflows, it would
make sense to me to correct underflows too, for
example with the following patch:
--- ./kernel/posix-timers.c.orig 2004-11-19 21:11:05.000000000 +0100
+++ ./kernel/posix-timers.c 2004-12-03 02:23:56.000000000 +0100
@@ -1208,7 +1208,10 @@ int do_posix_clock_monotonic_gettime(str
tp->tv_sec += wall_to_mono.tv_sec;
tp->tv_nsec += wall_to_mono.tv_nsec;
- if ((tp->tv_nsec - NSEC_PER_SEC) > 0) {
+ if (tp->tv_nsec < 0) {
+ tp->tv_nsec += NSEC_PER_SEC;
+ tp->tv_sec--;
+ } else if ((tp->tv_nsec - NSEC_PER_SEC) > 0) {
tp->tv_nsec -= NSEC_PER_SEC;
tp->tv_sec++;
}
best,
Herbert
next reply other threads:[~2004-12-03 2:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-03 2:03 Herbert Poetzl [this message]
2004-12-03 3:00 ` do_posix_clock_monotonic_gettime() returns negative nsec john stultz
2004-12-03 8:43 ` George Anzinger
2004-12-03 8:56 ` Andrew Morton
2004-12-03 3:08 ` Andrew Morton
2004-12-03 3:20 ` Herbert Poetzl
2004-12-03 8:53 ` George Anzinger
2004-12-03 17:22 ` Herbert Poetzl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041203020357.GA28468@mail.13thfloor.at \
--to=herbert@13thfloor.at \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox