public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>
To: dipankar@in.ibm.com, rusty@au1.ibm.com, ak@suse.de,
	gareth@valinux.com, davidm@hpl.hp.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC] Strange code in cpu_idle()
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2004 15:11:49 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041204231149.GA1591@us.ibm.com> (raw)

Hello!

Strange code in i386, ia64, and x86-64 cpu_idle():

	void cpu_idle (void)
	{
		/* endless idle loop with no priority at all */
		while (1) {
			while (!need_resched()) {
				void (*idle)(void);
				/*
				 * Mark this as an RCU critical section so that
				 * synchronize_kernel() in the unload path waits
				 * for our completion.
				 */
				rcu_read_lock();
				idle = pm_idle;
				if (!idle)
					idle = default_idle;
				idle();
				rcu_read_unlock();
			}
			schedule();
		}
	}

Unless idle_cpu() is busted, it seems like the above is, given the code in
rcu_check_callbacks():

	void rcu_check_callbacks(int cpu, int user)
	{
		if (user || 
		    (idle_cpu(cpu) && !in_softirq() && 
					hardirq_count() <= (1 << HARDIRQ_SHIFT))) {
			rcu_qsctr_inc(cpu);
			rcu_bh_qsctr_inc(cpu);
		} else if (!in_softirq())
			rcu_bh_qsctr_inc(cpu);
		tasklet_schedule(&per_cpu(rcu_tasklet, cpu));
	}

And idle_cpu() is pretty straightforward:

	int idle_cpu(int cpu)
	{
		return cpu_curr(cpu) == cpu_rq(cpu)->idle;
	}

So I would say that the rcu_read_lock() in cpu_idle() is having no
effect, because any timer interrupt from cpu_idle() will mark a
quiescent state notwithstanding.  What am I missing here?

If I am not missing anything, then the attached patch would be in
order here, though there might be some additional work required.
(Though I thought that the try_stop_module() stuff took care of
all of this these days...)

Note that we really, really do want the idle loop to be an extended
quiescent state, otherwise one gets indefinite grace periods and
runs out of memory...

						Thanx, Paul

diff -urpN -X ../dontdiff linux-2.5/arch/i386/kernel/process.c linux-2.5-idle_rcu/arch/i386/kernel/process.c
--- linux-2.5/arch/i386/kernel/process.c	Mon Nov 29 10:47:14 2004
+++ linux-2.5-idle_rcu/arch/i386/kernel/process.c	Sat Dec  4 14:53:37 2004
@@ -144,14 +144,12 @@ void cpu_idle (void)
 {
 	/* endless idle loop with no priority at all */
 	while (1) {
+		/*
+		 * Note that it is illegal to use RCU read-side
+		 * critical sections within the idle loop.
+		 */
 		while (!need_resched()) {
 			void (*idle)(void);
-			/*
-			 * Mark this as an RCU critical section so that
-			 * synchronize_kernel() in the unload path waits
-			 * for our completion.
-			 */
-			rcu_read_lock();
 			idle = pm_idle;
 
 			if (!idle)
@@ -159,7 +157,6 @@ void cpu_idle (void)
 
 			irq_stat[smp_processor_id()].idle_timestamp = jiffies;
 			idle();
-			rcu_read_unlock();
 		}
 		schedule();
 	}
diff -urpN -X ../dontdiff linux-2.5/arch/ia64/kernel/process.c linux-2.5-idle_rcu/arch/ia64/kernel/process.c
--- linux-2.5/arch/ia64/kernel/process.c	Mon Nov 29 10:47:18 2004
+++ linux-2.5-idle_rcu/arch/ia64/kernel/process.c	Sat Dec  4 14:54:30 2004
@@ -230,6 +230,10 @@ cpu_idle (void *unused)
 
 	/* endless idle loop with no priority at all */
 	while (1) {
+		/*
+		 * Note that it is illegal to use RCU read-side
+		 * critical sections within the idle loop.
+		 */
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 		if (!need_resched())
 			min_xtp();
@@ -239,17 +243,10 @@ cpu_idle (void *unused)
 
 			if (mark_idle)
 				(*mark_idle)(1);
-			/*
-			 * Mark this as an RCU critical section so that
-			 * synchronize_kernel() in the unload path waits
-			 * for our completion.
-			 */
-			rcu_read_lock();
 			idle = pm_idle;
 			if (!idle)
 				idle = default_idle;
 			(*idle)();
-			rcu_read_unlock();
 		}
 
 		if (mark_idle)
diff -urpN -X ../dontdiff linux-2.5/arch/x86_64/kernel/process.c linux-2.5-idle_rcu/arch/x86_64/kernel/process.c
--- linux-2.5/arch/x86_64/kernel/process.c	Mon Nov 29 10:48:05 2004
+++ linux-2.5-idle_rcu/arch/x86_64/kernel/process.c	Sat Dec  4 14:55:13 2004
@@ -133,19 +133,16 @@ void cpu_idle (void)
 {
 	/* endless idle loop with no priority at all */
 	while (1) {
+		/*
+		 * Note that it is illegal to use RCU read-side
+		 * critical sections within the idle loop.
+		 */
 		while (!need_resched()) {
 			void (*idle)(void);
-			/*
-			 * Mark this as an RCU critical section so that
-			 * synchronize_kernel() in the unload path waits
-			 * for our completion.
-			 */
-			rcu_read_lock();
 			idle = pm_idle;
 			if (!idle)
 				idle = default_idle;
 			idle();
-			rcu_read_unlock();
 		}
 		schedule();
 	}

             reply	other threads:[~2004-12-05 23:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-12-04 23:11 Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2004-12-06  0:32 ` [RFC] Strange code in cpu_idle() Michael Buesch
2004-12-06  9:54   ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-12-06 10:01     ` Michael Buesch
2004-12-06  9:47 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-12-06 11:02   ` Dipankar Sarma
2004-12-06 14:33     ` Zwane Mwaikambo
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-12-06  9:13 Li, Shaohua

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20041204231149.GA1591@us.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=davidm@hpl.hp.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=gareth@valinux.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rusty@au1.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox