From: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com>
To: Per Jessen <per@computer.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.4.28 - kswapd excessive cpu usage under heavy IO
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 10:57:16 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041206125715.GA2393@dmt.cyclades> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200412061214.48754.per@computer.org>
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 12:14:48PM +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
> (apologies if this is sent more than once)
> I've found similar incidences in the archives, but none that indicates that a
> solution was found.
> I'm seeing excessive cpu usage by kswapd on a 4way 500MHZ Xeon with 2GB RAM.
What is your workload? Except the massive amount of inode's/dentries in your
system do you have anonymous memory hungry applications running?
If you do have a significant amount of anonymous pages on your system you might
want to try 2.4.29-pre1 which contains a VM change which should decrease their
impact on the VM page freeing efforts (including kswapd CPU usage).
Since you have massive amount of inodes/dentries you might want to tweak
/proc/sys/vm/vm_vfs_scan_ratio (increase from 6 to 10 and so on...)
> A find in a directory containing perhaps 6-700,000 files makes the box almost
> grind to a halt. In 12days uptime, kswap has used 590:43.82, and during the
> find-exercise usually runs with 90-100% util.
Can you boot with profile=2 and use readprofile tool to read the functions which
are using most CPU time with
readprofile | sort -nr +2 | head -20
Do that on a 2.4.28 and 2.4.29-pre1 kernels.
> The file-system is 150GB with JFS117 on a software-RAID5 - not exactly optimal,
> I agree, but reasonably workable.
>
> I've read that 2.6 has significant improvements in this area, but upgrading is
> not currently an option.
Yes, v2.6 VM design is way better than v2.4's in many aspects.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-06 18:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-06 11:14 2.4.28 - kswapd excessive cpu usage under heavy IO Per Jessen
2004-12-06 12:57 ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-12-07 9:14 Per Jessen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041206125715.GA2393@dmt.cyclades \
--to=marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=per@computer.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox